LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind Farm Inquiry Day 7 — Afternoon 

Further evidence has been presented to the Middlemoor inquiry about the potential impact of turbines on the landscape and historic sites.

Northumberland chairman for the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Dominic Coupe, told the hearing: “Our group is concerned that this beautiful and historic landscape, in England’s most tranquil county, would be significantly impacted in a way that is alien to it.

“I consider the impact on the landscape character of the area, altering a tranquil, rural landscape with great time-depth to one dominated by large modern industrial structures.

“I identify the use made of it by members of the public, its value both as an irreplaceable historic and landscape resource, and to the local economy.

“I note also the potential cumulative impact with other applications for similar development within the planning system and address the increased risk to travellers on the major route through the area.”

Mr Coupe outlined a swathe of sites of historic interest, stretching from Holy Island across to Flodden Field, which the CPRE fears would be irreperably damaged by the turbines.

He added: “I conclude that this development will cause severe harm to the setting of nationally important historic resources; severely damage the landscape character of the area.

“It will be harmful to visual amenity, for both residents and visitors, cause potential cumulative and road safety impacts, and that not only will it will not accord with government policy designed to protect the countryside and the historic environment but, also, it fails to accord with the government’s policy on the location of renewable energy proposals.”

Northumberland Gazette

22 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky