LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Is wind power the answer? 

The rush to wind power by Nova Scotia Power may be welcome news to those urging the power corporation to lessen its dependence on coal in favour of greener energy sources such as wind, but to those facing the real prospect at having turbines in their face it’s not so welcome.

Earlier this week, Nova Scotia Power CEO Ralph Tedesco said the corporation is on the verge of signing contracts with six developers to contruct wind farms at eight different locations in the province including in Cumberland, Colchester and Pictou counties.

What Tedesco calls “invisible gold” is not something wind farm opponents like Lisa Betts and her Gulf Shore Association is looking forward to. They have waged a long and sometimes bitter campaign against a proposed development on the Gulf Shore they believe will infringe on their properties.

Wind energy is good for the environment in that it lessens our dependency on fossil fuels like oil and coal. Other jurisdictions have been harnessing the power of the wind for generations and there are thousands of wind turbines in use in both Europe and elsewhere in North America.

However, before we rush off to embrace wind energy we must make darn sure it’s not going to ruin people’s lives. While it would be easy to study this to death, there has to be definitive answers to lingering questions and they must be settled before the first turbine is put in place next door to communities and homes. It’s too late to try and answer questions after they’re already erected.

Let’s get it right while we still have a chance with solid fact-based evidence so we’re not looking back at what could have been done.

The Amherst Daily News

22 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky