[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Farm Inquiry Day 7 — Morning  

Wind farm developers have deliberately “exaggerated and overestimated” their case for turbines at Middlemoor, according to two expert witnesses.

The inquiry heard first from Dr John Constable, Director of Policy and Research for the Renewable Energy Foundation, an independent charity which provides data and information about renewable energy technologies.

He appeared on behalf of Save Northumberland’s Environment, which asked him to re-examine data provided by npower renewables about the claimed benefits for the proposed turbines.

It included projected carbon dioxide savings and energy generation levels.

But presenting his findings, he said: “Having reviewed npower’s claimed benefits in the light of knowledge current at the time at which the Environmental Statement was written, and in the light of subsequent information, I conclude that they are significantly exaggerated, and should be revised downwards.

“The statements of benefit are inadequately demonstrated, significantly overstated, or presented in ways likely to mislead.”

Dr Constable was particularly critical of the company’s predicted energy yields – around 27.3 per cent – which he said was not based on site-specific measurements of wind resource, but on a national average.

He said: “This does not amount to site specific demonstration, and fails to satisfy the requirements of government guidance.

“In regard to energy generation quantifications, I find that npower’s statements are couched in terms likely to lead to inaccurate inferences of significance.”

Dr Constable also poured cold water on claims made in the ES that the wind farm would generate enough power to supply 27,000 local homes, adding it was unlikely that Middlemoor would perform as well as npower anticipated.

“It is important that the available capacity space for wind energy is not occupied by sub-optimal wind sites,” he said. “It is still not obvious that Middlemoor is a suitable location.

“In point of fact, the applicants have not provided evidence to demonstrate the energy generation benefits, and what evidence is available does not support the view that the Middlemoor site is even a nationally mediocre location.”

Dr Constable was followed by town and country planning expert Steve Arnold, who was also called by SANE to examine planning policy.

He said: “To the extent that national policy ascribes significant weight to the wider benefits of renewable energy developments, then it is essential to undertake a proper evaluation of the benefits, to be balanced against the harm which the proposal would cause.

“Drawing on the evidence of Dr Constable, it is evident to me that the actual contribution that this proposal will make to renewable energy objectives will be insignificant, and that the benefits claimed by the applicant are significantly exaggerated.

“These factors should be weighed against the sacrifice of a valued and valuable landscape to an alien form of development.”

Mr Arnold added that npower had underestimated and downplayed the impact on the landscape and heritage, as well as residents, and the potential loss to the tourist industry.

He said: “The proposals conflict with the development plan, and there are no considerations which point to a decision being made contrary to the development plan.

“The Middlemoor proposals should be refused.”

Northumberland Gazette

22 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.