LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Expensive, inefficient & just plain ugly 

Credit:  The Orleans Record, orleanscountyrecord.com 7 December 2011 ~~

The Charlotte Planning Commission is reviewing a proposal to build 345 solar panels in a field off Hinesburg Road and Spear Street. The panels will be 4 feet off the ground on the bottom and 10 feet high in the air. They will cover about 50 acres of land.

Last week, in the face of rich subsidies and friendly court rulings in favor of Lowell’s GMP wind farm, we predicted that Vermont will become carpeted with ridgeline wind towers and ground-level solar panels if the brakes aren’t put on the rush to so-called “green” alternate power sources.

Only three things associated with these projects are thus far certain: 1) They are hugely expensive to the utility users and taxpayers; 2) They are notoriously inefficient and unreliable and; 3) They are really ugly.

The protesters in Lowell – and previously in Sheffield – aren’t protesting because they object to the price or reliability of green power towers and solar panels, but because they believe them to be environmental and aesthetic blights. We’ve seen the degradation of land in other places where wind towers and solar panels have proliferated and it sure ain’t pretty.

As long as Obama and Shumlin keep sacrificing big money on the altar of green energy, we’ll see power companies cashing in and our beloved landscapes pimped out.

Source:  The Orleans Record, orleanscountyrecord.com 7 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky