[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Colebrook wind tower project vote set for today 

Credit:  By JASON SIEDZIK, The Register Citizen, www.registercitizen.com 8 June 2011 ~~

NEW BRITAIN – The final chapter in BNE Energy’s attempt to bring residential wind power to Connecticut will be written today.

The Connecticut Siting Council will vote on Colebrook North – the second of two proposals to build wind turbines in Colebrook – at their 11 a.m. hearing. The council previously rejected a proposal to build the turbines in Prospect, but signed off on Colebrook South, a proposal for Flagg Hill Road.

Colebrook North, sited off of Rock Hall Road, is not far from Colebrook South, and both proposals are near the town’s border with Norfolk. The seven-month saga saw two Connecticut Siting Council members recuse themselves from the proceedings – chairman Daniel Caruso eventually resigned, while vice-chairman Colin Tait backed away due to his transitive association with a group opposing the turbines – as well as organized local opposition.

Joyce Hemingson, the president of FairwindCT, questioned the reasoning for the council’s decisions on the previous two proposals in a June 3 press release. The council cited population density and aesthetic reasons for rejecting the Prospect proposal, while Colebrook’s more dispersed population was not a reason to reject Colebrook South.

The council’s straw polls have served as a reliable indicator for how they will eventually vote on the proposals. The council rejected the Prospect proposal by a 5-2 vote, but approved Colebrook South by a 6-1 vote. Both vote totals were identical to the results of the straw poll. A straw poll taken at the council’s June 2 meeting indicated potential unanimous support for Colebrook North.

The only possible vote against the plan came from Phil Ashton, who voted “yes, possibly.” Ashton was the only vote against Colebrook South.

Source:  By JASON SIEDZIK, The Register Citizen, www.registercitizen.com 8 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky