[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Campaigners’ joy at wind mast refusal  

Credit:  Staffordshire Newsletter, www.staffordshirenewsletter.co.uk 4 February 2011 ~~

Plans for a wind monitoring mast near Church Eaton have been thrown out by South Staffordshire Council – to the delight of campaigners fighting wind farm plans.

Wind Prospect’s application for a temporary 70m wind monitoring mast on land at New House Farm, Brineton was refused by the council planning committee on Tuesday.

Wind Prospect’s application for six 126-metre high (base-to-tip) wind turbines and an 80-metre anemometry mast at the same Brineton site is set to be discussed by the council next month.

More than 50 people staged a peaceful protest against the mast plans outside Tuesday’s meeting. Stone MP Bill Cash has also opposed both applications.

Tony Lendon, chairman of King Street Stag (Stop Turbine Action Group) said:

“Whilst we are delighted with the decision to reject the application for the temporary mast, we know that we cannot think that the job has been done.

“It will be far harder to convince the council to reject the main application, but with the tremendous support we have had from local residents, councilors, parish councils, neighbouring district councils, MPs and MEPs, we are confident of further success.”

Paul Grimshaw, development manager at Wind Prospect Developments Ltd, said: “We are disappointed with the refusal of the met mast application.

“We will now wait for the decision notice from the Local Planning Authority, which will give more information on why the application was refused.

“Until we have that information, we are unable to determine whether to appeal this decision.”

Source:  Staffordshire Newsletter, www.staffordshirenewsletter.co.uk 4 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter