LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaigners’ joy at wind mast refusal 

Credit:  Staffordshire Newsletter, www.staffordshirenewsletter.co.uk 4 February 2011 ~~

Plans for a wind monitoring mast near Church Eaton have been thrown out by South Staffordshire Council – to the delight of campaigners fighting wind farm plans.

Wind Prospect’s application for a temporary 70m wind monitoring mast on land at New House Farm, Brineton was refused by the council planning committee on Tuesday.

Wind Prospect’s application for six 126-metre high (base-to-tip) wind turbines and an 80-metre anemometry mast at the same Brineton site is set to be discussed by the council next month.

More than 50 people staged a peaceful protest against the mast plans outside Tuesday’s meeting. Stone MP Bill Cash has also opposed both applications.

Tony Lendon, chairman of King Street Stag (Stop Turbine Action Group) said:

“Whilst we are delighted with the decision to reject the application for the temporary mast, we know that we cannot think that the job has been done.

“It will be far harder to convince the council to reject the main application, but with the tremendous support we have had from local residents, councilors, parish councils, neighbouring district councils, MPs and MEPs, we are confident of further success.”

Paul Grimshaw, development manager at Wind Prospect Developments Ltd, said: “We are disappointed with the refusal of the met mast application.

“We will now wait for the decision notice from the Local Planning Authority, which will give more information on why the application was refused.

“Until we have that information, we are unable to determine whether to appeal this decision.”

Source:  Staffordshire Newsletter, www.staffordshirenewsletter.co.uk 4 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky