LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Legislature won’t take up Walker’s wind-siting bill 

Credit:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel, www.jsonline.com 4 February 2011 ~~

A bill to restrict development of wind power projects won’t be taken up in the Legislature’s special session, but a move is under way to have the governor’s concerns addressed in a different way.

The bill is the only Walker proposal in the jobs-focused special session that didn’t clear the state Assembly.

The Republican-controlled Legislature won’t take up the wind-siting bill at this time, but appeared Friday to be moving toward a possible vote to block a wind siting standard passed last year by the state Public Service Commission from taking effect.

A hearing has now been scheduled for Wednesday on the PSC’s wind-siting rule. The hearing will take place before the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules.

During a bill signing in Madison Friday afternoon, Walker said he would continue to work on the issue, either by changing administrative rules or with a bill in the regular legislative session that is now under way.

“I want to see the wind industry, like every other industry, be effective here in the state of Wisconsin,” Walker said. “I just want to find a way to balance that with . . . property rights.”

Just because Walker’s proposal won’t be voted on in the special session doesn’t mean the issue is dead, said Andrew Welhouse, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau).

“The fact that there is a public hearing on Wednesday should show you that there are still conversations between the people involved throughout Wisconsin and the members of the Legislature who are here to represent them,” Welhouse said.

The PSC rule called for wind turbines to be set back at least 1,250 feet from nearby homes, and included specific limits on decibel levels for wind turbines as well as shadow flicker. Walker rejected that approach as hurting the property rights of nearby landowners, instead proposing a bill that would bar construction of wind turbines if they are within 1,800 feet of a property line.

Renewable energy supporters have said the Walker proposal would risk $500 million in investment over the next two years in the state, as wind developers look outside Wisconsin to build projects. The Illinois Wind Energy Association recently issued a call to Wisconsin wind developers that Illinois is “open for business” for wind energy.

Possible outcomes now could include having no statewide standards at all, one year after the Legislature passed a law calling for uniformity in wind standards, said Mike Brown, spokesman for state Sen. Mark Miller (D-Monona).

“This appears to be a way to accomplish the same objective without subjecting themselves to a public vote on the floor of the Senate,” Brown said.

Rep. Jim Ott (R-Mequon), the Assembly chair of the committee that reviews administrative rules, said Friday that no decisions will be made until all sides are given a chance to speak at Wednesday’s hearing.

“Obviously there’s concern among the opponents of wind, particularly people who live near them who have issues with the noise and the shadow flicker,” he said. “On the other side are the people who build and service windmills who see a further setback as having a detrimental effect on their business.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty on this one,” Ott said.

Patrick Marley of the Journal Sentinel staff, reporting in Madison, contributed to this report.

Source:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel, www.jsonline.com 4 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon