LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine assessment process a 'rubber stamp' 

Re: Ontario Guidelines Protect Birds From Wind Turbines, Jan. 15, by David Timm.

As a well-paid lobbyist for a multibillion-dollar energy industry, I would expect this type of response from Mr. Timm.

There are certainly no adequate policies and processes in place to guide responsible wind development in Ontario. Your lobby group was given free reign to write policy word for word by the government in power. I believe, if your lobby group had its way, there would be no restrictions on where you can set up shop.The Canadian Wildlife Services has bowed down to your group and agreed not to make bird mortality information available to the public.

The environmental assessment process for industrial turbines is a farce.

No full assessment has been granted for any wind farm in Ontario. All projects have been rubber-stamped at the review level.

When I asked one of your Canadian Wind Energy Association colleagues if he thought it was responsible to site a large wind facility a short distance from Holiday Beach, he responded “the government allows us to do it.”

You claim Erie Shores Wind Farm shows no significant bird mortality. What do you define as significant? I have no way to rebut this claim, as you have ensured this data has been kept from the public.

CanWEA is not an environmental group. They are industrial lobbyists whose job it is to minimize the negative.

Maureen Anderson

Essex County Wind Action Group

Published: Tuesday, January 22, 2008

essexcountywind.wordpress.com

26 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky