LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Vermont town to vote on divisive wind project 

The town of Sheffield will gauge public opinion on a controversial wind project Thursday with a town meeting and vote on the proposal.

The vote, requested by group of citizens opposed to the wind farm in the small Northeast Kingdom town, will be advisory only. The state Public Service Board has authority over the project.

During the 7 p.m. meeting, which has been moved to the Millers Run School to accommodate a larger crowd, the Massachusetts developer, UPC Wind Management, will present its proposal to install at least 26 industrial wind towers on rural ridge lines in Sheffield and Sutton. The presentation will be followed by 10 minutes each of testimony by members of Ridge Protectors, a group opposed to the project, and Friends of Sheffield Wind Farm, which supports the project.

Greg Bryant of Ridge Protectors says the nearly 400-foot towers would ruin the rural landscape, hurt the economy and area tourism and provide no economic benefit to the community.

"It could be disastrous for us as far as any future development for our town. Our town would become a windmill town," he said Wednesday.

Bryant also said the multimillion dollar project is out of scale with the town that has just over 400 registered voters.

"It’s a giant thing for a tiny, tiny town," he said. "We have no resources to handle … this size project or company."

Supporters say the project would provide clean energy and generate tax revenues for Sheffield. And they say the community doesn’t have accurate information about the project and its potential effects.

UPC estimates the tax benefits would range from $150,000 to $350,000.

The company has hired a public relations firm to respond to concerns and build support in the community. It’s also set up offices in St. Johnsbury and plans to formally seek permission from the Public Service Board by the end of this year or early in the next year.

Leila LaRosa, a Sheffield resident whose property adjoins the site of the proposed wind farm, is paid to answer a hot line and e-mail questions about the project.
She had originally opposed the wind farm but said she changed her mind after doing research. She said she decided wind energy was a better alternative than other sources of energy.

UPC plans to sell some of the electricity it would generate to Washington Electric Cooperative in East Montpelier, and is talking with Vermont Electric Cooperative in Johnson and Burlington Electric Department about other deals, said Erik Filkhorn of Spike Advertising in Burlington.

"Our hope is to sell as much electricity locally," he said.

Opponents say the state is paying close attention to Sheffield, as six wind projects are being developed around Vermont.

Another Northeast Kingdom wind proposal in East Haven has drawn a mixed response from the state. The Vermont Department of Public Service supports the project while the Agency of Natural Resources opposes it, saying it could hurt migratory birds and bats.

"This is being watched statewide," Bryant said of Sheffield’s vote. "It’s a crucial vote.”

http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2005/11/30/vermont_town_to_vote_on_divisive_wind_project/

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon