LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Peru officials have approved a one-year moratorium 

PERU — Peru officials have approved a one-year moratorium on allowing windmills to be constructed within town limits. Town Council members unanimously approved the ban, citing the need to study the issue before making any more-permanent zoning decisions.

“This will allow our Comprehensive Planning Committee to take a look at regulations without the threat of something happening,” said Town Attorney Dennis Curtin, noting how the issue has caused problems in the Northern Tier, where municipalities had no restrictions despite a vocal public outcry against proposed windmill farms.

Under town zoning laws, anyone who wanted to construct a windmill would have to simply apply for a variance request. The moratorium, however, will restrict any construction of windmills.

The town held a public hearing on the matter Monday night, and about a half-dozen residents attended. They asked questions about the future prospect for windmills in the town.

“At this time, I know of no one who is interested (in constructing a windmill), and I’m not sure if there is anywhere in the town that would be suitable for windmills,” Curtin said.

It would be extremely difficult for anyone to receive permits to construct mammoth windmills on town property located within the Adirondack Park, Curtin said, noting that anything higher than 40 feet needs a special permit. Windmills constructed for energy are often hundreds of feet tall with blades 100 feet long.

None of the residents voiced any strong opposition to windmills, but a few people suggested the town should take a closer look at windmills as an alternative energy source and not exclude the possibility from future zoning efforts.

“This moratorium will allow the Comprehensive Planning Committee to study windmills and to make recommendations for future zoning in the town,” said Councilor Peter Glushko, who was sitting in as deputy supervisor in the absence of Supervisor Kenneth Jahn.

Curtin added that the town is neither against nor in favor of the concept of windmills, but the moratorium will allow officials to become more educated about the structures.

Several members of the town’s Planning and Zoning boards planned to attend a workshop on windmills being held by the county.

The Comprehensive Planning Committee, comprised of Town Council members, Planning and Zoning board members and town residents, has been charged with updating the town’s zoning laws. The group has been working on the update for a couple of years now but has not yet looked at windmills.

“This is a learning process for the town government,” Glushko said. “It will take some time to do, but, with the moratorium in place, it will give us the time we need.”

One resident asked if there would be any financial benefit to the town if a windmill farm was allowed to open in Peru. Curtin said the town would benefit from an increase in taxes but not from profits from the wind farm itself.

Another resident noted that it was fine to consider new alternatives for energy, but the need for more conservation also needed to be addressed. The councilors agreed with that concept but added that much has to be learned to determine the future of windmills in Peru.

“We want to be fair to both sides,” said Councilor and Supervisor-elect Donald Covel. “This one-year moratorium will allow us to do just that.”

E-mail Jeff Meyers at:

jmeyers@pressrepublican.com

http://www.pressrepublican.com/cgi-bin/newspro/fullnews.cgi?newsid1133400842,58175,

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky