[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm zoning proposal rejected – County commissioners: current rules are enough  

Kittitas County commissioners on Tuesday unanimously rejected a proposal to change how the county handles wind farm projects and said the county’s current wind farm siting ordinance provides ample public involvement and environmental safeguards.

The proposal, from lawyer Steve Lathrop, would restrict wind farms to the south and east ends of Kittitas County and place other requirements on locations of wind farm towers.

Commissioners Perry Huston, David Bowen and Alan Crankovich said they didn’t see a compelling reason to change the county’s wind farm ordinance, though Huston said he wants to explore placing specific wind farm siting criteria in the county’s ordinance.

“Our current process works, it’s not broken,” Huston said after the hearing.

Bowen said he was concerned Lathrop’s proposal, if adopted, would weaken the county’s position in defending its decisions to reject a wind farm if the same project came before the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council.

He said the present wind farm ordinance creates a strong public record of decisions by the county Planning Commission and county commissioners.

Crankovich said Lathrop’s proposal does have merit, but it would be “very, very difficult” to change the county’s wind farm site review and permitting process in midstream.

He said an application for a wind farm is presently under review by the county, referring to Horizon Wind Energy’s revised application for a 64-turbine project 13 miles northwest of Ellensburg.

In past months, commissioners approved the Wild Horse wind farm centered 17 miles east of Ellensburg. Wild Horse, now under construction, was developed by Horizon Wind Energy and later purchased by Puget Sound Energy.

Commissioners in April rejected the Desert Claim wind farm proposed by EnXco USA Inc. for 8 miles north of Ellensburg. EnXco failed in it is court appeal of the decision and has declared it will seek approval of the project from the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council.

Huston said supporters of Lathrop’s proposal contend it would protect western parts of the county from wind farm development and that wasn’t an accurate conclusion. He said wind farm developers could apply to change the comprehensive plan to allow a project in an area other than the proposed east county zone.

“I’m not prepared to abandon our present process, though it is tedious and time consuming,” Huston said.

Lathrop, after the hearing, said his proposal, as a change in the county comprehensive plan, calls for public hearings, environmental impact statements and decisions by the Planning Commission and the county commissioners.

He said his proposal just limits where wind-power developers can apply for wind farms. He said it gives the public, local government, landowners and wind-power developers clear direction, whereas the county’s current ordinance is unclear.

“My proposal in no way undermines local government control or authority,” Lathrop said. “It actually gives county government a more solid basis for why local decisions on wind farms should be upheld. It enhances the county’s credibility.”

Lathrop said he has no intention to give up on the issues he has raised because the problem of siting wind farms will not go away.

“How and where they are located is much too important to the county and directly affects our long-range future of the county.”


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.