[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm developer challenges moratorium – Company claims county is stalling its wind farm study  

MANITOWOC — A Wisconsin wind farm developer has filed a claim against Manitowoc County alleging its 12-month moratorium on wind farms is illegal. Emerging Energies LLP of Hubertus alleges the moratorium, issued May 17, has damaged the company's plans to construct seven large-scale, industrial wind turbines around the village of Mishicot.

RENEW Wisconsin Inc., a non-profit renewable energy organization in Madison, is also alleging in the claim the moratorium deprives electricity customers access to Focus on Energy grants and contravenes state public policy, which supports wind and renewable energy systems.

The claim was filed with the county clerk on Nov. 7. The county has 120 days to deny or admit the claim. Regardless, it is an indication wind energy advocates feel the county may be moving forward too slowly with wind energy farms.

Edward J. Ritger, a lawyer representing Emerging Energies, said the development should continue because the company’s application for construction was submitted to the county before it adopted a moratorium. According to Ritger, the county has not addressed Emerging Energy’s construction plan and has deliberately delayed the process by focusing on unrelated wind constructions.

"We were told by the county to ‘bear with us’ as we work out the concerns with the ordinance," he said. "Six months later they’re just starting to look at large turbines."

If the study committee delays development long enough, Ritger said, Emerging Energies would be in dire financial straits.

"We are seeking a quick end to the moratorium as it applies to Emerging Energies," he said.

On May 17, the county board voted unanimously for a moratorium on any new proposals for wind turbines.

The purpose of the moratorium was to give the Wind Energy Systems Advisory Committee time to make recommendations to the Planning and Parks Department on possible amendments to the county’s wind ordinance. The committee held its first meeting in June.

The moratorium would not affect a development by Navitas Energy for a 49-turbine Twin Creeks Wind Farm development in the northern part of the county. Navitas had permission to continue because the permit for construction was approved before the moratorium.

Public pressure to review the original wind energy ordinance gave rise to the advisory committee because the ordinance didn’t address turbine location, noise and public safety concerns, said committee Chairman Ralph Kozlowski.

"We had to separate between small and large wind systems because there were different sets of issues involved," he said.

The committee is scheduled to present its recommendations on small wind systems to the county Planning and Parks Commission on Dec. 5. It is then up to the commission to hold hearings and vote on the recommendations. The commission is working on possible modifications to a large wind system ordinance.

But it will take three to four months for the Wind Energy Systems Advisory Committee to complete deliberations on the wind ordinance and finalize changes, according to County Executive Dan Fischer.

"By the time the claim is heard in court, the ordinance changes may be finalized," Fischer said.

Kristopher Wenn: 920-686-2132 or kwenn@htrnews.com


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.