[ exact phrase in "" ]

[ including uploaded files ]


List all documents, ordered…

By Title

By Author

View PDF, DOC, PPT, and XLS files on line
Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe


Add NWW documents to your site (click here)

Cutting through the Spin 

Author:  | Australia, Health, Noise

Do wind turbines cause adverse health effects? What are the mechanisms?

Out to what distance?

What is the existing evidence?
– Peer reviewed and published in journals, based on data rather than “reviews”
– Peer reviewed

What is the wind industry (and its many supporters and paid experts) saying?

How can we move forward?

Do Wind Turbines Cause Adverse Health Effects?

YES!!  Reported by clinicians and residents (including turbine “hosts”), workers and visitors around the world.

Clear patterns of exposure to operating wind turbines leading to a characteristic range of health problems, variably expressed depending on individual susceptibility.

Not everyone is affected, and onset of symptoms varies.

If affected, cumulative exposure worsens symptoms. Always improve with cessation.

First reported by “front line” clinicians – rural physicians:
– Dr Amanda Harry (UK) 2003
– Dr David Iser, Toora, Victoria, Australian 2004
– Dr Nina Pierpont, US Paediatrician 2009

Others now investigating/reporting include:
– Professor Robert McMurtry, Ontario 2010
– Dr Chris Hanning, Sleep Physician, UK
– Dr Mauri Johansson, Danish Occupational Physician
– Dr Eckhardt Kuck, German Oral Surgeon

What are the mechanisms?

Known to cause harm to health from other sources:
– Low Frequency noise (LFN; 20–200 Hz)
– Infrasound (0–20 Hz)

Other possible mechanisms suggested by researchers:
– Ground borne (seismic) vibrations
– Rapid changes in barometric pressure
– Electromagnetic fields

Known mechanisms – LFN

Leventhall, 2003 literature review for UK’s DEFRA:

  • LFN exposure caused range of symptoms identical to “wind turbine syndrome” in a case control study – source of LFN was compressors
  • LFN also reported to cause a physiological stress response (eg in sleeping children exposed to truck LFN – elevated cortisol
  • People appear to become “sensitised”
  • Symptoms worsen with ongoing exposure
  • Denial of symptoms and lack of understanding by clinicians results in increased psychological stress

Known mechanisms – Infrasound

No data on long term human exposure in the public domain (but used acutely as a “non-lethal weapon”).

Short term exposure (1 hour) in young fit adults resulted in elevated blood pressure, nausea, ear pressure.

Chronic exposure in rats (1 study)
– Oxidative stress mechanism (rats fed antioxidants showed less damage)
– Focal organ damage (eg liver, brain, kidneys, testes, heart muscle)

Adrenaline and cortisol release measured in animal gut.

Acoustic Field Evidence

Infrasound and low frequency noise from wind turbines is being measured inside the homes and workplaces of sick people by the following acousticians (some have themselves become sick):

– Mr Rick James, USA
– Mr Rob Rand, USA
– Mr Steven Ambrose, USA
– Mr Steven Cooper, Australia
– Dr Bob Thorne, Australia
– Mr Les Huson, Australia
– Professor Colin Hansen, Dr Con Doolan, Adelaide University

Over what distances are adverse health effects reported?

Characteristic symptoms of “body vibrations” and the “waking repeatedly at night in a panicked state” out to 10km from Waterloo wind development in South Australia (VESTAS V90 wind turbines, rated at 3MW – size matters).

Frenchman severely affected aler 3 years of exposure at 11.5km, but 2MW turbines at 4,000ft altitude. Does altitude affect sound energy transmission?? (wind turbine infrasound measured at Hubert’s home).

Other reports of “sensitised” people affected out to 35km and more (US, Wales, Australia – “the HUM”).

Distance Effect of Wake Turbulence

Distance Effect of Wake Turbulence

Peer reviewed published DATA

Wind turbine health specific research data:

Dr Daniel Shepherd “Noise & Health”– Confirmed sleep disturbance and adverse impact on health related quality of life in cross sectional study.

Dr Michael Nissenbaum (publication in Oct 12)
– Data described beginnings of a dose response curve.

Krogh, et al WindVOICE survey Ontario confirmed Dr Amanda Harry’s findings from UK.

Møller & Pedersen 2011 (Size Matters – larger turbines emit more proportional LFN).

Professor Alec Salt – physiologist – “inner ear reacts very differently to infrasound where there is very low background noise (eg quiet rural environments)” and at 60dBG will provoke a vestibular response and the “alerting mechanism” or “fight flight response” (levels of 60dBG are commonly being measured).

“Vibroacoustic disease” with prolonged LFN exposure eg in aviation workers, now being identified in German residents exposed to wind turbines long term (Alves Pereira, and Chao)
– Pericardial thickening
– Mitral and tricuspid valve abnormalities
– Thickened wall of blood vessels
– Dramatic increase in late onset epilepsy.

Summary of current hypotheses

Acute responses
– activation of vestibular dysfunction via inner ear
– Headache symptoms possibly LFN via eyes, or EMF

Chronic response
– Repetitive physiological stress
– Chronic cumulative severe sleep deprivation
– Psychological stress because of lack of response of responsible authorities, and hostile community

Long term tissue damage (vibroacoustic disease)

What do the wind developers say?

It varies!! Privately employees from Origin, Suzlon have admitted they know people get sick.

Some categorically deny any health problems anywhere (Infigen, in Senate testimony).

Some admit some people get “stressed” and infer or openly state this is because of “scaremongering” (Acciona in Senate testimony).

Professor Wittert, paid expert for Acciona in the Paltridge case, admitted people were “sick” and “stressed” but blamed scaremongering.

What is the evidence for “scaremongering” causing the symptoms at existing wind projects?

First reports from medical doctors:
– 2003 Dr Amanda Harry, UK (Rural GP)
– 2004 Dr David Iser, Toora, Victoria (Rural GP)
– 2009 Dr Nina Pierpont, USA (Paediatrician)

First reports by Waubra residents in Victoria to media and health authorities were in 2009.

I first spoke out publicly in July 2010.

What do wind developers and others (eg SA EPA) say about infrasound?

“there is no infrasound at a well maintained wind farm” (SA EPA guidelines), but:

  • Infrasound measured and reported by NASA in 1989 at “upwind” turbines in Hawaii.
  • Dr Frits Van Den Berg reported it in 2004.
  • Since measured at multiple developments in Australia and the US by James, Rand, Ambrose, Cooper, Huson, & Thorne.

How can we move forward?

RESEARCH – multidisciplinary, done by those with no vested interests in the outcome.

LEGAL – cases are currently underway in a number of different parts of the world (especially in Ontario and Australia).

July 2011 judgment in Canada

“This case has successfully shown that the debate should not be simplified to one about whether wind turbines can cause harm to humans. The evidence presented to the Tribunal demonstrates that they can, if facilities are placed too close to residents. The debate has now evolved to one of degree.” (p. 207) (Emphasis added)

—Environmental Review Tribunal, Case Nos.: 10-121/10-122 Erickson v. Director, Ministry of the Environment, Dated this 18th day of July, 2011 by Jerry V. DeMarco, Panel Chair and Paul Muldoon, Vice-Chair

Outcome - Home Abandonment

Outcome – Home Abandonment

Presented at:
Sowing the Seeds of Farmer Health
2nd National Centre for Farmer Health Conference
17-19 September 2012
Hamilton, Victoria, Australia

Download original document: “Cutting through the Spin

This material is the work of the author(s) indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this material resides with the author(s). As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Queries e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon