[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Can governor assure State Pier price won’t keep rising? 

Credit:  Editorial | The Day | Published May 02. 2021 | www.theday.com ~~

We share state Sen. Paul Formica’s frustration over the growing price tag of the State Pier’s redevelopment plan and the “so what?” attitude of the Connecticut Port Authority and the Lamont administration.

“I can’t tell you how offended I am at the total mismanagement of the project,” Formica said at a recent meeting of the port authority board. “You should all resign if you can’t get this right.”

The Republican’s 20th Senatorial District includes New London and its port.

Like this editorial board, Formica sees the value in the project’s concept. Use a combination of private and state funds to upgrade the long underperforming port; the incentive for that private investment being utilization as a staging area for large-scale offshore wind-power development.

While that use is expected to dominate port activities for the next decade or so, when it is completed New London will have a state facility able to accommodate larger and more varied cargo ship merchandise.

But that private-public sharing is increasingly looking public heavy.

When the price tag for the major redevelopment was placed at $157 million, the private share of $70 million – coming from the

Ørsted and Eversource partnership in support for their offshore wind projects – was about 45% of the cost, a near split.

Then the price tag started to creep up and has kept creeping. More aptly, it has been rocketing up.

When Gov. Ned Lamont met with our editorial board in January, he said the new estimate was around $200 million. In mid-April, Kosta Diamantis, deputy secretary of the state Office of Policy and Management, who is overseeing the project for the administration, told the State Bond Commission the new estimate was $235 million.

That makes the private share now 30%, not nearly as impressive.

The Ørsted-Eversource partnership apparently knew what it was doing when it locked in its contribution. One has to wonder if it had instead been obligated to a proportional share of the eventual costs, say around 40%, that Ørsted-Eversource would have made darn sure the costs did not escalate like this.

Also maddening was Diamantis lack of any real explanation. These things happen on big projects, was his attitude, and by extension the attitude of the administration and the port authority. “It is what it is,” Diamantis said.

This situation needs the attention of the congressional delegation – Rep. Joe Courtney and Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, Democrats all with Democrats in control of the House, Senate and presidency. A big infrastructure package is still being negotiated. How about making sure the language supports State Pier redevelopment qualifying for some of that federal funding?

It checks off all the boxes. It is surely infrastructure. The port is in a distressed city. The plan includes private investment. And it is in support of renewable energy and mitigating climate change, priorities for the Biden administration.

Meanwhile we’d like to trust that this is the final surprise, that we now know what this project will cost. Maybe Gov. Lamont can provide such an assurance? How about, rather than “it is what is,” a gubernatorial statement – “This is it, no more.”

Source:  Editorial | The Day | Published May 02. 2021 | www.theday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon