[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Carbon judge rules against Atlantic Wind turbines  

Credit:  By Den McLaughlin | Times News | April 24. 2020 | www.tnonline.com ~~

A Carbon County judge has granted the appeal of two Penn Forest Township property owners who sought to stop the construction of 37 wind turbines in the township.

Property owners Phillip C. Malitsch and Christopher Mangold filed the action in May 2017 against the township zoning board, Atlantic Wind LLC and the Bethlehem Authority. The authority owns the land where the proposed wind turbines were to be constructed. The two plaintiffs’ properties abut the Bethlehem property.

In a 61-page opinion Judge Steven R. Serfass wrote, “Atlantic Wind has failed to demonstrate that the sound produced by the proposed wind turbines will not exceed 45 A-weighted decibels and that there will be only one principal use on the proposed project area. Atlantic Wind has failed to meet its burden of persuasion that the proposed wind turbine project will comply with all the objective requirements for special exception to the granted under the Penn Forest Township Zoning Ordinance.”

The two plaintiffs filed their appeal on May 22 challenging the “notice of deemed approval” published by Atlantic Wind in the Times News.

In response to Atlantic Wind’s notice, on May 25, 2017, the township zoning hearing board filed a “motion to strike notice of deemed approval published May 5, 2017.

Atlantic Wind then intervened that action on June 5, 2017, followed on June 7, 2017, by the township in support of the plaintiffs. Bethlehem Authority then joined the action with its own filing on June 20, 2017.

Following legal briefs and oral arguments held before Serfass, Atlantic Wind’s zoning application was deemed approved and that the township zoning hearing board lacked standing to strike the notice of deemed approval.

After that the legal battle continued as both sides filed numerous motions in support of their position. Serfass then appointed Attorney William G. Schwab to sit as referee in the matter and instructed him to receive additional evidence in the matter. He conducted two hearings and submitted his conclusions of law to the court. After that Serfass heard oral argument on the merits of the zoning appeal.

Serfass’s order states: “1) The land use appeal of Phillip C. Malitsch and Christopher Mangold is granted; 2) The deemed approval of the application of Atlantic Wind, LLC, for a special exception under the Penn Forest Township Zoning Ordinance is vacated; and 3) The application of Atlantic Wind, LLC for special exceptions under the Penn Forest Township Zoning Ordinance is denied.”

During the various motions and hearings held by the court, the plaintiffs’ chief argument was that the noise produced by the turbines would be such it would make living near them almost impossible and ruin their property value.

Both sides called acoustical engineers concerning the noise the turbines would produce at court hearings.

Atlantic Wind has since filed a new application to construct the wind turbines. That action is also being challenged in the courts by the township and township residents, specifically about 42 property owners in the area where the construction is proposed.

The action is pending and working its way through the courts. The last filing in that pending matter was on July 26, 2019, when legal briefs were filed by the various parties involved.

Atlantic Wind has the right to appeal Serfass’ opinion asking him to reconsider or filing an appeal directly with the state Commonwealth Court.

Source:  By Den McLaughlin | Times News | April 24. 2020 | www.tnonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch