[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Go to multi-category search »



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

City dwellers wouldn’t tolerate wind turbines  

Credit:  The Columbus Dispatch | Jun 9, 2019 | www.dispatch.com ~~

The June 3 Dispatch editorial “Energy bailout bill needs Senate changes to truly be clean” was totally off the mark in at least one regard. To wit: “The bill would further hamstring wind power … by giving local townships the ability to overturn approval of new wind projects via popular vote in a ballot referendum.”

Three wind farms planned for Erie, Huron, Sandusky and Seneca counties, together will place nearly 200 wind turbines in the rural landscape. These are not your father’s wind turbines, rather these are enormous machines with moving parts that are taller than any building in Columbus.

I grew up on a farm in Sandusky County, and it breaks my heart to consider the harm these wind farms will cause to the area. The flicker, the noise and the sheer ugliness of the wind turbines would transform a bucolic landscape into a nightmare.

Since when is The Dispatch against local control? Rural Ohioans deserve the same consideration and protections as urban Ohioans.

As Rep. Bill Seitz said during the House floor debate on HB 6, “I guarantee you, all of us big city slickers would not sit still for one minute if someone came along and said they’re going to put a 600-foot-tall moving-part wind turbine anywhere near my property.” Perhaps The Dispatch should reconsider its apparent opposition to local control over rural lives.

Sam Gerhardstein, Marysville

Source:  The Columbus Dispatch | Jun 9, 2019 | www.dispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar "fair dealing" provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: