[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Not done fighting turbines, conservationists say 

Credit:  Louis Pin | Strathroy Age Dispatch | September 28, 2018 | www.strathroyagedispatch.com ~~

Frustrated by what they say are thousands of unreported bird and bat deaths, activists are calling for the new provincial government to take a closer look at the hundreds of wind turbines that dot rural Ontario.

These conservationists want the Environment Ministry to scrutinize what they say are flawed environmental assessments on the province’s existing turbines, saying the huge industrial windmills are responsible for tens of thousands of bird and bat deaths across Ontario each year

These deaths, they say, are not counted properly.

Part of that could be chalked up to Ontario’s regulations: large turbines can tower more than 150 metres high but the province only requires inspectors, when counting bird and bat deaths, to measure 50 metres from each base.

“A lot of the birds that get hit are flung well beyond that point,” Brian Salt, owner of the Mount Brydges animal rehabilitation clinic Salthaven, said. “They’re not counted in that survey.”

The danger can become more acute for birds during their seasonal migrations, said Linn Eves, owner of Bluewater Centre for Raptor Rehabilitation.

“There’s always bird activity; there’s more right now because of the migration and again in the springtime. . . . I wish there were volunteers that maybe could check the areas for injured birds.”

According to conservation charity Nature Canada, thousands of birds are killed in Canada each year through collisions with turbines, or through disruption of migratory routes and habitat destruction.

If turbines surpass the province’s allowable threshold for mortalities – 14 small birds and 10 bats per turbine, per year – their owners must alter them accordingly.

The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, when contacted by the Sarnia Observer, stressed “the majority” of turbines do not exceed this allowed threshold, adding ministry staff would continue to monitor bird and bat mortality in Ontario.

“The wind industry is committed to respecting and protecting wildlife habitat and the environment, particularly for birds and bats,” Brandy Giannetta, a member of the pro-turbine Canadian Wind Energy Association, wrote in an email. “Our recently published Bat Conservation Review ensures industry and regulators have access to the most current information available, so they can make science-based decisions.”

But for many conservationists, the turbines remain another problem for species in a rapidly developing Southwestern Ontario landscape.

“Bats are already in big trouble with white-nose syndrome, and things like that,” Salt said. “We’ve added that extra stressor to them.”

In 2015, Blue Point resident Kristen Rodrigues volunteered to audit the Renewable Energy Approval for a wind farm near her house, saying the company behind the project, Suncor, was “not even looking at the public’s interests” while changing aspects of its wind farm after public consultation.

The 46-turbine Cedar Point II Wind Energy Centre northeast of Sarnia was completed in October that year and was later ceded to NextEra Energy Canada, the current owners.

“I didn’t have an opinion one way or another. I really didn’t,” Rodrigues said. “But when I started learning about how they were doing the process, it really bothered me.”

NextEra Energy did not reply to a request for comment.

That’s not to say inspectors aren’t doing their jobs. One inspector speaking anonymously said his company accounts for “estimator variables” by planting test carcasses in the area. These fakes are intended to measure how effective their measurements are, and the company then adjusts the results based on how many of the dummy carcasses are found.

Other variables such as predators are also accounted for, the industry source said, suggesting their methods tend to overestimate, rather than underestimate, bird and bat deaths. Wind farms are often tested more than once.

Inspectors are required to test between the beginning of May and the end of November. That seven-month range is the minimum and does not account for winter months.

The Cedar Point II wind farm was not measured over the winter, and that’s a problem, Rodrigues said, advocating for an updated, 12-month assessment.

“Just because you’re not being listened to doesn’t mean you stop talking,” Rodrigues said. “Some day somebody’s going to listen.”

Source:  Louis Pin | Strathroy Age Dispatch | September 28, 2018 | www.strathroyagedispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tags: Complaints, Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon