LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Seeking answers over wind turbine 

Credit:  By John Divinski | Bayshore Broadcasting | February 5, 2018 | www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca ~~

Saugeen Shores council has approved extending an invitation to the manager of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC), Rick Chappell to a future meeting of council to talk wind turbines.

Specifically, council wants to question him about the concerns of residents near the UNIFOR turbine in south Port Elgin, affected by night time urban noise and the health issues it creates.

In a prepared notice of motion, council wants “To hear first-hand, the MOECC’s position in regards to regulating or the lack thereof” when it comes to turbines.

Saugeen Turbine Operation Policy (STOP) spokesperson Greg Schmalz, who spoke during the Open Forum portion of the meeting on Monday, January 29th is not impressed with Chappell’s work.

Schmalz accuses Chappelle of allowing the testing of the turbine to be voluntary rather than mandatory.

He states, “When the Director of Approval says this must be tested as part of the requirements..of doing the approval and you (Chappelle) the cop, on the beat, chooses not to enforce the law, something’s happening.”

The UNIFOR turbine, formerly the CAW turbine, has been an issue in Port Elgin for the past five or six years.

Still there is no definitive audit study of the turbine.

Deputy Mayor Luke Charbonneau says council has sent a letter to the Ontario Ombudsman, looking for help and direction, only to receive an answer that has been called “a catch-22” reply.

Charbonneau says the letter intimates that, “You have to do an audit before you can prove non-compliance but you have to prove non-compliance before you can do an audit. The Ombudsman didn’t say that was a problem but it seems like a problem to me.”

Source:  By John Divinski | Bayshore Broadcasting | February 5, 2018 | www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon