[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Gamekeepers want more transparency on Highland windfarm impacts  

Credit:  Written by Tom Ramage | Strathspey & Badenoch Herald | 13/11/2017 | www.strathspey-herald.co.uk ~~

Gamekeepers are calling for more openness on the impact of windfarms on Highland wildlife.

The Scottish Gamekeepers Association said monitoring and reporting around wind farms to be tightened up to provide greater transparency.

The representative body, which has 5300 members, believes an agreed code could replace a “blame culture” should raptors or other wildlife disappear.

Gamekeepers on grouse moors were implicated this year when a report concluded up to 41 out of 131 satellite tagged eagles in Scotland may have disappeared over 12 years.

At the time of publication, the SGA noted its dissatisfaction with findings on wind farm impacts but chose not to speak out, focusing instead on condemning wildlife crime.

But with more and more highland windfarms now in existence, many overlapping with grouse moors, the gamekeeping body believes new monitoring codes will be needed.

Their call comes after a report showed sea eagles, golden eagles and the like to be at the highest risk to turbine mortality.

The report was compiled jointly by a wide group of bodies including RSPB, Birdlife International, IUCN, Cambridge University, University College London, Imperial College London, University of Stellenbosch and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

“Gamekeepers have witnessed raptor mortality at wind farm sites and have themselves located stricken birds in vegetation outlying turbines,” said SGA Chairman Alex Hogg.

“The body has no issues with renewables, with many estates now augmenting sport shooting with wind farms or hydro schemes, but the members feel post-construction monitoring codes need to be revisited so causes of bird mortality are clearer.

“A code for on-going monitoring of windfarms, for wildlife impacts would be helpful.

“Checks exist but are inconsistent and organised by operators themselves, often using maintenance crew. There is no statutory duty to report bird collisions in Scotland,” he went on.

“We said at the time we were not convinced by the wind farm element of the satellite tagged eagle report but we didn’t want to detract from our condemnation of illegal behaviour.

“We have, ourselves, expelled six members in five years for wildlife crime convictions.

“However, we disagreed, and still do, with the report’s assumption there would be little motive for wind companies not to report downed birds. “Our members have witnessed dead raptors under turbines and up to 200 yards from turbine masts- way beyond the 50m radius operators are recommended to search and report. Most have felt duty bound not to speak because turbines march onto land they manage.”

The report said turbines could not be seen as a major cause of missing eagles because no final tag signals were within 1km of a turbine. But “We know signals only register a limited number of times per day. Also, when a missing hen harrier’s tag’s final signal was found to be on an RSPB reserve, at Insh Marshes, the public were told last signals were only an ‘indication’ of a broad general area the bird was in. We feel there is insufficient data to corroborate.

“By speaking out there will be people all too ready to damn us but, as a representative body, we see it as our duty to defend our members’ right not to be assumed as guilty until proven innocent for the disappearance of every bird that flies over a moor in Scotland, when other factors may or may not be at play.

“By agreeing codes for monitoring, there would be greater transparency.”

Source:  Written by Tom Ramage | Strathspey & Badenoch Herald | 13/11/2017 | www.strathspey-herald.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.