[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

With turbines, assets could be gone with wind  

Credit:  By JONI RIGGLE | Observer Today | www.observertoday.com ~~

Why should the wind companies be allowed to jeopardize our greatest assets?

Please note the eye-popping, downright chilling, excerpts from the minutes of the Chautauqua County Planning Board from the Nov. 10, 2015, meeting, regarding the Arkwright Summit wind farm project and Dunkirk airport. (You can find the entire minutes and report online.)

Wind company rep – “Relocation could potentially kill the project … Re-engineering costs money, as does delays.”

George Spanos, county Department of Public Facility director – “I may have misunderstood, but you had the determination of hazard on the towers for some time now, yet you continued to move ahead”.

Rep – “The towers will increase the circling heights needed for Cat D aircraft”

Lou Nalbone, Dunkirk aviation – “This airport, with its recent runway construction, was designed with the intent of lowering the descent altitude to 250 feet to allow precision landing. The turbines tower over the airport are potential obstacles; any missteps by the pilots could be devastating. The bottom line is the county made a significant investment in this airport recently, and it is now potentially jeopardizing that investment.”

John Frey, county Planning Board – “The county comprehensive plan has a number of other projects in this particular area, like ATVs,equestrian trails, etc. Is there an impact on any of those projects?”

Mark Geise, formerly of county Planning Department – “Of course there will be impacts.”

Sadly, EDPR placed turbines within viewshed of the ponds and lean-tos, in spite of Mr. Geise’s adamant plea not to do this. (See shadow flicker analysis below).

¯ Our county leaders recently announced we have a buyer for the Cockaigne Ski Resort! Such wonderful news – it was beloved by locals, out-of-state residents and school clubs.

The buyers have stated they would like to expand the resort, include the Grainery, perhaps build condos or a hotel,and are even considering making it a year round venue.

Unbelievably, EverPower /Cassadaga Wind plans on placing 10 500-foot turbines on the hillside directly in front of the slopes. Would you choose to ski at a resort with 10 skyscraper sized turbines-spinning/ flickering by day and flashing red strobe lights at night in your face as you navigate the slopes? They are disorienting and potentially dangerous This will create an industrialized unwelcoming, and distracting landscape, with possible noise issues for those seeking nature’s retreat.

¯ Shadow Flicker Analysis by Everpower on Recreational Trails: The Earl Cardot East Overland, Equestrian, Snowmobile and Boutwell State Forest will experience Flicker, especially dangerous for horses and riders. Please view you tube videos of wind turbine shadow flicker- no small thing. Also the turbines proximity to trails has the potential for blade/ice throw injuries.

¯ EverPower is selling the electric out of state. New York won’t even benefit from the RECs – renewable energy credits. Those credits won’t count towards New York’s Clean Energy Standard.

¯ The New York state Historic Preservation Office declared the Cassadaga Wind Project will have an adverse effect on cultural resources and will forever alter and change our rural setting.

We have so much to lose for little if any gain. New York state electric bills are already reflecting increased rates due to inefficient industrial scale renewables, that ironically keep us natural gas dependent, thus fail to make meaningful reductions in CO2 levels. This ill-conceived and short-sighted wind project should not be approved, it would clearly be a detriment to our community.

You can submit comments to The state Department of Public Service regarding the Cassadaga Wind Project-Case 14-F-0490.

Joni Riggle is a Sinclairville resident.

Source:  By JONI RIGGLE | Observer Today | www.observertoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

HOME
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter