[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind-farm fiasco part of ugly energy file  

Credit:  EDITORIAL: Wind-farm fiasco part of ugly energy file | Ottawa Sun | December 08, 2016 | www.ottawasun.com ~~

The Ontario government jerked around a wind-power company for a couple of years, and it’s going to cost the taxpayers – $28 million, to be exact.

It’s one dismaying chapter in a much larger story about the profound ineptitude with which Ontario’s energy file – from gas plants to hydro prices to the sale of Hydro One – has been handled.

To make this particular story short, in 2011, the government put a moratorium on offshore wind farms. This project had previously been a cornerstone of the McGuinty government’s green energy plan.

Politicians said the wind farm moratorium had nothing to do with politics. An election was coming and lakefront homeowners were ticked off about the prospect of wind farms out on the water. (On land or water, locals are rarely enthusiastic about giant windmills going up. Shocker.)

Windstream Energy is the U.S. company with which the government made a deal for building windmills out on the Great Lakes. After being stung by the province, the company sued under the North American Free Trade Agreement.

The official reason for scrapping the plan in 2011 was that the government was concerned about whipping up toxic goo on the bottom of the lake. More research was needed, it said.

The tribunal found that those worries were legitimate.

“At the same time, however, the evidence before the tribunal suggests that the decision to impose the moratorium was not only driven by the lack of science,” the ruling also noted. “The impact of offshore wind on electricity costs in Ontario, as well as the upcoming provincial elections in November 2011, also appear to have influenced the decision, and the latter in particular in light of the public opposition to offshore wind that had emerged during the relevant period in many parts of rural Ontario.”

The catch was there were never, and never has been, any studies done on this.

Instead, the government, in a stunning show of arrogance strung Windsteam along like a bad high-school relationship.

“The regulatory and contractual limbo in which (Windstream) found itself in the years following the imposition of the moratorium was a result of acts and omissions of the Government of Ontario,” the tribunal found.

How can the Liberals defend the $28 million taxpayers are now going to have to fork over?

They can’t. But it just goes to show that the ongoing disgrace over Ontario’s energy probably hasn’t hit rock bottom yet.

Source:  EDITORIAL: Wind-farm fiasco part of ugly energy file | Ottawa Sun | December 08, 2016 | www.ottawasun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.