| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Proposed wind farm remains a threat to air base
Credit: Another Voice: Proposed wind farm remains a threat to air base | By John B. Riggi | The Buffalo News | June 18, 2016 | www.buffalonews.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
In the world of business, decisions are made and corporate direction taken. However, to ensure proper accountability for those decisions and directions, one person has the “D.” The D means the decision. The D means responsibility and accountability for that decision.
In the past few weeks, APEX Clean Energy, in an all-out attempt to allay fears over industrial wind turbine encroachment on the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station (and risk to jobs at that base), brought Dave Belote to Western New York for private meetings with a number of interested parties. Those interested parties included many political and public groups (town/county government and Save Ontario Shores, to name a few).
Reports from these meetings showed Belote indicating that, in his experience as an Air Force officer and federal employee and through his government acquaintances, the Lighthouse Wind Project would be unlikely to pose a risk to the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station (NFARS). To support his argument, he produced two “informal review” letters from the Department of Defense Siting Clearinghouse.
While Belote’s military service to our country is commendable, his current service to Cassidy & Associates (a pro-wind consulting firm) and previous service as a vice president of federal business for APEX Clean Energy are of particular interest. History aside, this gentleman is a pro-wind consultant whose job is to minimize the specter of risk at NFARS.
The reality is as follows: The verdict on the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station is fully in the hands of Defense Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission. The decision on whether to close NFARS will be made by and only by BRAC. BRAC has the D. Any reason, such as encroachment on military operations caused by industrial wind turbines, will remain a significant factor in potential closure of NFARS.
So, the questions to Western New Yorkers are clear:
Are we to believe those who are looking to profit from a project that may very well pose an encroachment risk to NFARS?
Are we willing to risk 3,000 well-paying jobs in Western New York based on informal letters of support for this destructive project?
Given BRAC has the D, how much faith are we willing to put into statements that downplay the risk?
It is safe to assume that the very existence of APEX’s Lighthouse Wind Project does not strengthen the case for ongoing operations at NFARS. This fact should be enough for every citizen of Western New York to join the legislatures of Erie, Niagara and Orleans counties as well as the Western New York state legislative delegation to oppose the APEX Lighthouse Wind Project.
John B. Riggi is a councilman in the Town of Yates.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=78072 ]
