[ exact phrase in "" ]

[ Google-powered ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Lawyers accuse each other of ‘overstating’ cases in West Norfolk wind farm inquiry  

Credit:  Lynn News | 17 June 2016 | www.lynnnews.co.uk ~~

A public inquiry into controversial wind farm plans for land close to two West Norfolk villages has closed today with both sides accusing the other of overstating their case.

Falck Renewables is seeking to overturn West Norfolk Council’s decision to refuse planning permission for nine turbines on a site at Ongar Hill, near Clenchwarton and Terrington St Clement.

A four-day hearing into the scheme ended at the Knights Hill hotel, on the edge of Lynn, this morning.

And, during final submissions, David Hardy, for the developer, claimed the authority had over-estimated the impact the development would have on the surrounding landscape.

He acknowledged there would be an impact, but insisted it was within acceptable limits.

And he argued that the fact the site was still being proposed for development several years after it was first put forward, and following a change of government policy to end subsidies for on-shore wind schemes, showed the strengths of their case.

He said: “It is clear that this remains an excellent location for a commercial wind farm of this size and scale.

“There continues to be strong support for each and every one of these turbines.”

Mr Hardy also accused the council of “opportunism” for opposing the scheme even though its current development plans did not contain specific policies relating to wind energy schemes.

But, in his closing statement, Tim Leader, for the borough council, maintained the authority did have a current plan and insisted there were sound reasons for dismissing the appeal.

He said: “The weight of public opinion is against the scheme. That opposition is based on valid planning reasons.

“Local people believe that if this development were to take place their environment will be badly damaged.

“The appellant has failed to appreciate and under-stated the harm that will be caused to the environment, misunderstood and misapplied the development plan and government policy and attached too much weight to the limited benefits of its scheme.

“The scheme will harm the distinctiveness and diversity of the landscape. That harm arises from the unsuitability of the appeal site for wind farm development in terms of its location and the impact it will have on environmental assets.”

Following the session, planning inspector Paul Jackson visited the site and nearby homes, whose residents fear the development would have a major impact on them if it is allowed to proceed.

Source:  Lynn News | 17 June 2016 | www.lynnnews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User contributions

Share:


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

HOME
Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share