[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Champion approves agreement with wind farm  

Credit:  By ELAINE M. AVALLONE | May 22, 2016 | www.watertowndailytimes.com ~~

WEST CARTHAGE – Following the public hearing at its May meeting, the town of Champion board decided to opt out of a tax exemption for a solar or wind energy system or farm waste energy system as defined in state Real Property Tax Law.

The action stems from a discussion of an outline of understanding with the Copenhagen Wind Farm presented at the April 4 town board meeting.

The proposed wind farm project would include a transmission line running through a section of the town.

According to Town Attorney Timothy A. Farley, Real Property Tax Law allows the town to negotiate a payment-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT) agreement and opting out would require industrial development authority ownership to negotiate an exemption.

Town Supervisor Bruce R. Ferguson said the Carthage, Indian River and Copenhagen school districts had opted out, as did several other towns.

“We can work with either one,” said Mr. Farley. “This way, we are on the same playing field with the others who opted out.”

The board also agreed to a revised outline of understanding from Copenhagen Wind Farm LLC.

Last month the Town Council turned down the proposal because of the stipulations about the exemption. In addition, the board questioned the assessed value for the transmission line on which taxes would be calculated.

“They call it a feeder line,” councilman Thomas Stewart said. “It’s not; it’s a transmission line, and should be taxed as one. A feeder line would be from the wind tower to a substation. A transmission line is from station to station.”

“It’s hard to come up with good numbers for a cost of replacement,” said town assessor William Vargulick.

The town attorney advised the board to approve the outline of understanding and “see what it looks like in the end.”

Source:  By ELAINE M. AVALLONE | May 22, 2016 | www.watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.