[ exact phrase in "" ]

[ Google-powered ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Amazon indifferent to neighbors’ property rights  

Credit:  The Columbus Dispatch | May 22, 2016 | www.dispatch.com ~~

I respond to the Thursday Dispatch article “Amazon: Ease limits on wind farms” about Amazon’s testimony on rules for locating industrial wind turbines in Ohio. The company sent a representative to the Statehouse for a hearing on a bill that would encourage development of wind farms in northwestern Ohio by reversing some recent rule changes.

The article is misleading in the sense it did not cover the questioning posed to Amazon’s spokesperson, John Stephenson. Given that there are benefits associated with Amazon’s fulfillment centers and data storage facilities, and given that there are known detriments to a community hosting turbines, Stephenson was asked if Amazon would balance the benefits and the detriments by locating its facilities in the proposed wind corridor. The answer was no.

Stephenson testified that Amazon would not get involved in the placement of the turbines. The follow-up question was whether the company is willing to at least have standards that would limit the purchase of wind only from facilities with protective setbacks. Again, the answer was no.

Siting is not something Amazon cares about. The rules being proposed by the wind industry do not provide for compensating a neighboring property owner when the adverse effects of noise and moving shadows diminish the neighbor’s amenity. Wind developers and their “green” adherents are indifferent to the property rights of northwest Ohioans.

Testimony indicated that to respect property rights would be “cost prohibitive.” It appears the population density of Ohio makes it an unsuitable state for wind development.

Julie Johnson

Urbana

Source:  The Columbus Dispatch | May 22, 2016 | www.dispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User contributions

Share:


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

HOME
Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share