[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Turbine site preparation appeal denied  

Credit:  By Bruce Bell, The County Weekly News/The Intelligencer | Thursday, March 31, 2016 | www.intelligencer.ca ~~


The Alliance to Protect Prince Edward County (APPEC) received another setback on Wednesday in its efforts to stop site preparation at the White Pines Wind Project in Athol and South Marysburgh wards.
Late Wednesday, APPEC received word an Ontario Divisional Court judge dismissed another appeal by the group to have work at the site delayed until the Environmental Review Tribunal (ERT) renders a final decision on the status of the project.
Last summer, the Ontario Environment Ministry issued an approval to wpd Canada to install and operate a facility of 27 turbines. That decision met with strong opposition with both APPEC and resident John Hirsch filing appeals.
On March 22, the ERT ruled wpd Canada could proceed with site preparation despite its previous ruling the project would cause serious and irreversible damage to Blanding’s Turtles and Little Brown Bats. In its March 22 decision, the ERT provided APPEC with no explanation or reasons why it ruled against the motion of stay to delay site work.

In a release Wednesday evening, APPEC president Orville Walsh stated the lack of an explanation came back to haunt the group at the Ontario Divisional Court hearing.
“APPEC provided evidence from four expert witnesses of serious and irreversible harm to Blanding’s turtles if wpd proceeds with vegetation clearing, (but) what APPEC could not provide to the court, however, was the ERT’s reasons for its decision of last week to dismiss our stay as the ERT never provided reasons,” he wrote. “Justice Stewart noted in her decision that the specific grounds of any such appeal are uncertain given the fact that reasons for the decision are still forthcoming. By not providing any reasons for dismissing our motion for a stay the ERT has handcuffed APPEC in appealing its decisions.”
Walsh said Justice Stewart did tell APPEC they could bring the matter back before the court once the ERT released its reasons for denying the appeal.

Source:  By Bruce Bell, The County Weekly News/The Intelligencer | Thursday, March 31, 2016 | www.intelligencer.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch