[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Shipmeadow man loses wind turbine court battle  

Credit:  By staff reporter | Eastern Daily Press | 20 November 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

A Shipmeadow man has failed in his legal challenge to build a wind turbine “taller than St Paul’s Cathedral” 500 metres from his home.

Benjamin Howell, who lives at Crake Hall, had asked London’s Court of Appeal to quash the decision of a government planning inspector granting permission for the turbine to be built at nearby Laurel’s Farm.

The application was originally refused by Waveney District Council in March last year and was opposed by the Broads Authority, ten town or parish councils and many residents.

However the inspector approved an appeal in 2014 by Stamford Renewable Energy Ltd, finding that while some would perceive the resulting changes to the landscape as harmful, the turbine would not prevent the public enjoyment of The Broads.

Mr Howell’s lawyers claimed that the planning inspector who gave the go-ahead made an “error of law” by misinterpreting his duty to protect the Norfolk Broads – only 750 metres away – from the impact of the turbine. They also argued the inspector hadn’t properly considered the benefits of the project or the noise it would produce.

But yesterday three of the country’s top judges rejected those arguments. Lords Justices Richard and Briggs and Sir David Keene and said that the High Court judge Mr Justice Cranston had produced a “thorough and careful judgment” rejecting the points. In the ruling under challenge, Mr Justice Cranston said that, while he was “troubled by a turbine which would be taller than St Paul’s in London”, the inspector who granted consent had been entitled reach his decision.

Source:  By staff reporter | Eastern Daily Press | 20 November 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.