LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Government blocks Cairnandrew turbines but finds council acted “unreasonably” 

Credit:  By Jamie Ross | The Press and Journal | 20 November 2015 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

The Scottish Government has blocked the creation of three massive wind turbines in a north-east hamlet.

Farming firm Inicio-Fresco Ltd wanted to erect the structures on land east of Cairnandrew near King Edward, but faced fierce opposition from locals.

A total of 78 objections were lodged with the council, and the local authority’s own planning team urged councillors to reject the proposals.

And the Banff and Buchan area committee threw out the turbines in June.

A Scottish Government reporter has now backed the local authority, but has flagged up errors in the report that was shared to councillors before they made their decision.

The report from the planning service gave inaccurate information about the location and numbers of approved turbines in the area.

But reporter Christopher Warren has said it was unlikely this would have changed the outcome.

“It was certainly unfortunate that the council’s committee report contained substantial factual errors regarding other pending and approved wind turbines,” he added.

“On the basis that these errors would have been capable of significantly influencing the decision-making process, the council did behave unreasonably in this regard. I am satisfied however that the council would have refused planning permission in any event.”

Mr Warren also backed councillors in agreeing that the project would have an adverse visual impact to the area.

The agent acting for the farming firm, 1 Stop Renewables, had claimed the project would boost the local jobs market if approved.

In its design statement submitted along with the planning application, it said: “The project would enable the farm business to be more environmentally-conscious and to do its part to safeguard the natural environment and help mitigate climate change.

“The income generated will also be reinvested in further agricultural and environmental work, which will create further employment opportunities.”

Source:  By Jamie Ross | The Press and Journal | 20 November 2015 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky