Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Plympton Wyoming backs off in turbine battle
Credit: By Lee Michaels | May 28, 2015 | blackburnnews.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Plympton-Wyoming is reluctantly backing down in its battle with Suncor over wind turbines.
At its meeting on Thursday, Plympton-Wyoming Council voted to repeal its noise bylaw designed to protect residents near industrial wind turbines.
Mayor Lonny Napper says the decision was based on legal advice that, under the current regulatory environment, the bylaw would not survive a legal challenge.
He says Suncor had launched another lawsuit against the town over the bylaw, prompting council to reluctantly agree that it wasn’t in ratepayers’ best interests to engage in litigation at this point.
The town is opposed to Suncor’s 46-turbine Cedar Point wind project in Plympton-Wyoming, Lambton Shores, and Warwick Township.
Plympton-Wyoming says that just two weeks ago, the German Medical Association stated the health effects of infrasound and low-frequency sound from turbines were “still open questions.” The association called for the suspension of wind energy projects near residential areas until there is reliable data to exclude a safety hazard.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: