[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Angus windfarm plan collapsed through boardroom split 

Credit:  By Richard Watt | The Courier | 17 October 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

A boardroom split was behind the collapse of an £80 million windfarm in the Angus Glens, The Courier can reveal.

But developers who pulled the plug on the 17-turbine Nathro Hill project have said they “fully expect” to come back with a new venture in the region once “differences” have been resolved.

Eurowind UK formally withdrew their application for the three-mile, industrial-scale windfarm in Glen Lethnot near Edzell and objectors were notified of the decision on Tuesday.

This followed a letter to the Scottish Government reporter allocated to the job from one of the firm’s two directors, Julian D’Arcy.

Mr D’Arcy wrote to case officer Liz Kerr asking for an extension to a planned meeting on October 29, before the application was fully withdrawn.

He spoke of a struggle between the firm’s owners and the other director, which had resulted in a takeover of Nathro Hill Wind Farm Limited.

“I would confirm that the true significance of the issue has only just become apparent and therefore I am raising it as soon as it was practical to do so,” he said.

“As you are aware this application is being promoted by Eurowind UK Ltd in conjunction with its wholly owned subsidiary Nathro Hill Wind Farm Limited.

“The sole director of Nathro is Ian Lindsay who you have been dealing with to date. Ian is one of the directors of Eurowind as am I. There are no other directors at the moment.

“Differences have arisen between Ian and the owners of Eurowind.

“Suffice to say that the majority shareholders have initiated the required corporate process to take control of the companies in hand, but these may not be concluded before the meeting (on October 29).”

A spokesman for the company last night said the current planning climate is behind its decision to withdraw the section 36 application.

He said: “Eurowind UK’s board is obviously disappointed by this decision but takes heart from the fact that this decision will allow them more time to deepen and strengthen ongoing discussions with the local community over the community ownership element of the development.

“The board fully expects to take the project forward at a later date with the offer of a comprehensive shared ownership package with the community.

“Ongoing wider discussions mean that Eurowind UK cannot comment further at this stage but intends to make further announcements clarifying their intentions and that of Nathro Hill Wind Farm very shortly.”

One of the activists against the plans, artist David Adam, said he was “delighted that this iconic Angus skyline will be saved”.

“Hopefully this mountain landscape backdrop to much of Angus will be free of turbines for our future generations to cherish,” he said.

“Many Angus artists have featured this ‘gateway to the Highlands’ view in their work, particularly David Waterson and James Morrison and I am sure that it will feature in many of my sketches for years to come.”

A spokesman for online action group Stop Windfarms At Nathro said members were “very pleased” to hear that the application was withdrawn.

The firm faced an uphill battle after Angus Council officials recommended official objection, on the grounds that the landscape and visual impact on the Angus terrain would be too great.

This followed objections by Scottish Natural Heritage and the Cairngorms National Park Authority on similar grounds.

Source:  By Richard Watt | The Courier | 17 October 2014 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky