[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine proposals thrown out  

Credit:  Barwick Advertiser | 05 March 2014 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk ~~

Wind turbine applications at Felkington and Wark have been rejected by Northumberland County Council’s planning and environment committee.

Councillors went along with officer recommendation to refuse plans for a pair of 34.5m-tall wind turbines at Felkington Farm, near Norham.

They then went against officer opinion to reject plans for a 47m-tall wind turbine at Wark Common.

The Felkington scheme, a commercial venture to export electricity to the National Grid, was turned down because of the impact it would have on the nearby Duddo Stones and local residents.

Officers had initially recommended approval of the application but changed their minds following a site visit and after taking into consideration the strong objection of Duddo Parish Council and the recent approval on appeal of a 74m-tall turbine at Shoreswood.

John Dowsett, principal planning officer, said the Felkington turbines, together with the Shoreswood mast, would collectively lead to an impact of ‘substantial harm’ to the setting of the stones.

At Wark, officers had recommended approval of a turbine for Straker-Smith Farms along with a temporary lattice steel met mast to measure wind speeds for up to two years. It was a new application following the quashing of permission for a 71m turbine at judicial review last year.

Although the proposed turbine was much smaller members heard concerns from Carham and Cornhill parish councils and 21 residents about the adverse impact on the landscape, residents and tourism.

Coun Anthony Murray said: “I spoke against the application after seeing the photo-montages of how it would look. There was a lot of local concern about it.”

Source:  Barwick Advertiser | 05 March 2014 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.