[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lowell backs wind project again  

Credit:  By BETH GARBITELLI | The Associated Press | March 05,2014 | rutlandherald.com ~~

Lowell voters affirmed their support Tuesday for Green Mountain Power’s Kingdom Community Wind project that is making electricity for the region on a ridgeline above the community.

The votes were cast at Lowell’s annual town meeting over 50-cent coffee and 50-cent doughnuts at the Lowell Graded School.

Communities around Vermont elected municipal officers, weighed in on budgets and authorized long-term capital borrowing Tuesday.

Lowell rejected an anti-wind project resolution that the Vermont Supreme Court ordered it to consider after the town passed over it at the 2012 meeting. This year, the paper vote was 110 against the resolution, 27 for it.

“It’s so important to Green Mountain Power to have strong community support, and we are very grateful for the trust that the people of Lowell have placed in us,” said Mary Powell, company president and chief executive, in a statement.

“I’m all for renewable resources, as opposed to sending our dollars to foreign powers who hate our guts,” said Town Auditor Arlon Warner. “The more we can rely on renewable energy – wind, hydro, solar – the more self-sufficient we can be to keep dollars in the United States and within the state of Vermont, too.”

In 2010, before Kingdom Community Wind was built, 75 percent of Lowell residents voted for the project.

Ed Wesolow, a resident who took the issue of the resolution to court, said before Tuesday’s vote that the ruling to put the issue back on the agenda was a win for democracy because it sparked additional discussion.

Money to the town from Green Mountain Power meant Lowell residents paid less in property taxes last year, although Wesolow worries that loopholes in the contract with the company might someday threaten its financial contributions.

“It is not unheard of for corporations to renege on contracts and leave you holding the bag, so that is a very real threat,” Wesolow said during the meeting.

In an email, company spokeswoman Dorothy Schnure said Green Mountain Power honors its commitments.

“Our financial commitment is to pay property taxes, which are locked down in an agreement with the town,” Schnure wrote.

Roger Willey said that for him, it’s more than a money issue. The back of his house is within a mile of three wind turbines that he says cause sound and light problems for him.

“It depends on the direction of the turbines themselves on how much noise that I hear. At some points I can hear it in the house, and then outside when the generators and the turbines are running, it’s constant humming noise,” Willey said.

Nancy Warner, president of the Lowell Mountains Group, said some policies need changing. A sister-in-law to Arlon Warner, she said the nonprofit group would like to see an independent sound study of the project and consideration of compensating property owners affected by any problems.

“We have a right in a democracy to be for and against,” she said. “What we have an absolute responsibility for on the local level and on the state level is to make sure that none of our Vermonters are hurt.”

Green Mountain Power says the company monitors the sound in accordance with Vermont Public Service Board protocol and that the company’s operating standard is “one of the strictest in the country.”

Despite the Lowell vote, Nancy Warner said she felt hopeful about progress on energy issues. “I feel really good about the outcome of this project in this community because it is helping others take a much stronger look,” she said.

Source:  By BETH GARBITELLI | The Associated Press | March 05,2014 | rutlandherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.