[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bylaw sought for noisy turbines 

Credit:  By Monte Sonnenberg, Simcoe Reformer | Tuesday, March 4, 2014 | www.simcoereformer.ca ~~

NORFOLK – A movement is afoot that could ultimately force wind turbine companies to shut down some units after dark.

North Perth Coun. Warren Howard is touring Ontario building support for a common bylaw that would silence turbines after dark if they produce noise that is audible to residents nearby.

“The legal advice we have is we can enforce a `quiet night’ provision,” Howard told Norfolk council Tuesday. “Yes, we’ll be challenged. But the legal advice we have is we can win.”

The Liberals’ Green Energy Act stripped municipalities of planning authority in the area of renewable energy projects several years ago.

In a recent ruling, a court said that Wainfleet Township had over-stepped its authority by trying to establish a large setback for wind turbines. However, the judge also said municipalities have the right to pass bylaws on nuisance issues that affect residents’ quality of life.

The Ministry of the Environment’s allowable noise range in rural areas is 51 decibels. Howard and his allies believe this is too high.

Ambient noise in rural areas after dark is in the range of 20 to 25 decibels. The proposed bylaw would cap allowable noise from wind turbines at 30 decibels.

Howard estimates it could cost as much as $50,000 to draft a common bylaw and $250,000 to defend it in court. Howard is on a speaking tour of municipal councils trying to raise funds for this initiative.

Howard acknowledged that one of the first questions he gets concerns noise related to farming. Normal farming practices, he said, are protected by right-to-farm legislation and are not the issue. Instead, Howard said the problem is round-the-clock noise problems created by the industrialization of the Ontario countryside through the insertion of wind turbines.

A total of 79 Ontario municipalities have declared that they are not willing hosts for the continued spread of green energy projects. Howard will visit as many as he can in search of money for a common bylaw.

Kincardine recently pledged $30,000 while the municipality of Huron-Kinross pledged $5,000. Howard is also seeking money from Norfolk. However, council voted to run the matter past the county solicitor before deciding what to do.

“Before we make any decision, we have to move cautiously,” said Port Dover Coun. John Wells.

Howard gave assurances that notions of “public nuisance” and “clearly audible” are legal concepts well established in Ontario law.

“We don’t need a scientific study to determine that barking dogs and loud stereos are a public nuisance,” Howard said. “Just so long as you pass such a bylaw in good faith, you should be all right.”

Simcoe Coun. Charlie Luke said he understood where Howard and his supporters are coming from.

“We know many of our residents in Clear Creek are not happy,” he said. “And we know residents in Port Ryerse are concerned. We are already on record as being an unwilling host community. And we have asked what else can we do? Well, here is something else we can do.”

Source:  By Monte Sonnenberg, Simcoe Reformer | Tuesday, March 4, 2014 | www.simcoereformer.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon