[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Cold and unhedged: How the polar vortex drove Clean Currents out of business  

Credit:  Michael Neibauer, Staff Reporter- Washington Business Journal | Feb 3, 2014 | www.bizjournals.com ~~

The polar vortex sunk Clean Currents LLC.

The Silver Spring-based renewable energy supplier surprised its customers, the green energy industry and government officials on Friday when it announced that it would no longer serve its 6,000 residential and 2,000 commercial clients in D.C., Maryland and Pennsylvania. Those customers were being returned to their local utility, effective immediately.

Gary Skulnik, Clean Currents president and co-founder, told the Washington Business Journal Monday that the company was too exposed on the wholesale energy market during the recent historic cold snap.

“The financials of the company were fine,” Skulnik said. “I’m not saying we were sitting on Apple kind of money, but we were operating. None of us suspected that we would be out of business in a week.”

How shocking was the Clean Currents’ shutdown?

On Jan. 23, the D.C. Public Service Commission approved the company’s 3-month-old bid to operate as a natural gas supplier in the nation’s capital. The DCPSC’s decision read, in part, that “Clean Currents has the ability and the financial integrity to serve natural gas customers in the District of Columbia.”

Eight days later, they were out of business.

A majority of Clean Currents’ on- and off-peak wind power purchases were hedged, Skulnik said, but enough were unhedged to sink the company as wholesale energy prices spiked.

“It’s not like prices went up 20 percent, or even 50 percent,” he said. “We saw prices that went up 500 percent. We were hedged, but we were not hedged enough. We didn’t have the resources to cover the spot market prices we were being hit by.”

One of the region’s fastest growing companies as recently as two years ago, Clean Currents was a business that area governments were eager to host.

In 2011, Montgomery County awarded Clean Currents a $50,000 grant to expand its business and remain in the jurisdiction for five years. The grant required that Clean Currents employ at least 29 permanent, full-time workers by Dec. 31, 2014 and maintain an average of 29 employees while keeping its primary business operations in the county until Dec. 31, 2016.

With the company now out of business, falling short of its contract with the county, that grant automatically becomes a loan that Clean Currents will have to pay back. The loan, per the contract, will have a 5 percent interest rate. Repayment “will be made in a lump sum on demand,” county officials say, or at the county’s discretion over a two-year period.

“Obviously, we’re just going to try to reach out them and start that process,” said Kristina Ellis, spokeswoman for the Montgomery County Department of Economic Development.

Skulnik declined to address the county grant.

Roughly 40 percent of Clean Currents’ customers were located in the District, the remaining 60 percent in Maryland and Pennsylvania.

In Maryland, Clean Currents’ customers may search for a new third party renewable energy supplier, or, if they choose, return to the standard utility – Pepco, in most cases. In the District, there is some question as to what options Clean Currents’ commercial customers have. The Washington Business Journal is working on an answer.

Skulnik said his next step is to finish his obligations to Clean Currents and then “let the dust settle a little bit.” He wants to do something in the private sector that helps the climate, he said, and the sudden Clean Currents closure should have no effect on his future.

“It had nothing to do with the fact that we were a clean energy supplier,” he said. “It had everything to do with the fact that we were were a small company with limited access to resources and we got hit with a once in a generation event.”

Source:  Michael Neibauer, Staff Reporter- Washington Business Journal | Feb 3, 2014 | www.bizjournals.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.