[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm opponents ready $28M lawsuit  

Credit:  By Tara Bowie, Woodstock Sentinel-Review | Wednesday, November 27, 2013 | www.woodstocksentinelreview.com ~~

NORWICH TOWNSHIP – The group against the Gunn’s Hill wind turbine project want potential investors to know if the wind farm goes forward legal action will be taken.

The East Oxford Community Alliance’s lawyer Eric Gillespie issued a press release Tuesday stating a draft $28-million legal claim was forwarded to Prowind Canada Inc., Gunn’s Hill Windfarm Inc. and landowners that are leasing land to the developer.

“The $28 million figure reflects the losses that could potentially be incurred by residents so it is a calculated amount based on the value of their properties and what they could lose,” Eric Gillespie, a Toronto-based environmental lawyer said.

Gillespie is working on multiple cases involving wind turbine farms across Ontario.

He recently filed a similar lawsuit for neighbours located near the site of a proposed wind turbine in the Creemore area. That lawsuit was dismissed by the court without prejudice because the project had not yet received the final approval from the Ministry of the Environment.

Gillespie said if Prowind receives a Renewable Energy Approval (REA) from the MOE the suit will be filed.

“We advised the defendants (Prowind) of the advance claim coming and offered them an opportunity to discuss things but we haven’t heard from them yet,” Gillespie said.

Joan Morris, East Oxford Community Alliance member said the group has worked with Gillespie’s office for about the last four years. The group hoped legal action wouldn’t be necessary to stop the project.

“Norwich Township has declared itself an unwilling host. Over the last five years we have made our views known. We feel this is the only way at this point that we may be able to protect our homes, agricultural businesses, livestock and our family’s health.”

Juan Anderson, Prowind project manager overseeing the 25-megawatt wind turbine said the company received the advance claim and is currently reviewing it.

“Unfortunately there is not a whole lot I can say publically around these kinds of things,” he said. “There has been a case similar a claim in April that has been dismissed. I see this as being very similar.”

Source:  By Tara Bowie, Woodstock Sentinel-Review | Wednesday, November 27, 2013 | www.woodstocksentinelreview.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.