Phantom electrons
Credit: Posted on October 25th, 2013 by Steve Macoy | Worth Reading | RepublicanAmerican | rep-am.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority has approved a $1 billion “renewable energy” project, the lion’s share of which will generate power … for Maine. The deal calls for Connecticut to buy energy from a 250-megawatt wind farm in upstate Maine and a 20-megawatt solar farm in Sprague.
It’s not quite as simple or bizarre as all that, of course. ”Because of transmission limitations, it appears that the electricity generated by this project will remain exclusively or largely in Maine and not be delivered to Connecticut or elsewhere outside of Maine,” regulators said. Explained William Dornbos, the Connecticut director of Environment Northeast, an advocacy group: “It’s always important to remember that we participate in a regional electric grid. More wind power helps lower electricity costs in our regional wholesale electricity market by pushing more expensive resources like oil-fired power plants, outside that market.”
Well, OK. We’ll see.
But here’s a more troubling thought. Read the first part of the PURA quote again. “Transmission limitations.” In these two words, we find the tragic flaw of wind energy.
To wit: You can build wind farms in very remote locations, but you’ll have trouble transmitting the energy they produce to populated areas.
You can identify suitable areas where high-capacity power lines are available, but such areas tend to be more heavily populated, and folks won’t let you build a wind farm there. They don’t like the danger of ice being thrown from the blades, they worry about something called “wind turbine syndrome” that supposedly sickens people, and they know wind turbines kill birds and other wildlife. So wind farms don’t get built in populated areas near power lines.
I think that’s what’s called a conundrum. It’ll be interesting to see how it’s resolved in this case.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=58097 ]
