[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Snags in ‘energy transition’ spook supporters  

Credit:  Date 18.09.2013 | Author Jeanette Seiffert / cd | Editor Michael Lawton | Deutsche Welle | www.dw.de ~~

Germany’s transition to renewable energy is a project of inspiring proportions. But is it too ambitious? At home and abroad, some are beginning to doubt Germany’s role as a leader in renewables.

It was with a sense of pride that politicians and energy industry representatives recently opened the Riffgat offshore wind farm near the North Sea island of Borkum, Germany. Thirty gigantic windmills with cutting-edge technology are supposed to deliver huge quantities of electricity. The problem? At the moment, far from creating all that energy, the windmills actually need some themselves.

The cables meant to link the windmills with the mainland have not yet reached the wind farm. They are 15 kilometers short (9.3 miles). In order to cool the facilities and keep them prepared for energy production, the installation requires a monthly supply of 20,000 liters (5,300 gallons) of diesel fuel.

As a result, the wind farm – at least for the next months – will be a producer of greenhouse gases rather than green electricity. It has also become a symbol of the difficulties facing the “Energiewende” – the great German energy turnaround.

Lessons from Fukushima

Two years ago, when Japan’s atomic catastrophe sent shockwaves around the world, the German government set for itself a highly ambitious goal. By 2022 at the latest, Germany would stop producing nuclear energy. Windmills, natural gas and solar electricity were increasingly to meet the country’s energy requirements. By 2015, renewables would account for 35 percent; by 2050, 80 percent.

Yet the exit from nuclear energy is just one element in the general energy turnaround.

“And that’s why we’re not just simply stepping away from nuclear power,” said German Chancellor Angela Merkel, “we’re meeting the conditions for the energy needs of tomorrow.”

Fossil fuels such as coal and oil are to be replaced; German houses are to be better insulated; thousands of wind farms in north German coastal areas are to be erected; the roofs of homes in sun-rich southern Germany will be mounted with photovoltaic panels. Thus far, such efforts have been largely successful. In the last 13 years, German renewable energy production has risen from six to 23 percent – not least because the German government has imposed a guaranteed high price for renewable energies – financed through a small surcharge on energy prices. German consumers, at the end of the day, are themselves paying for the energy turnaround.

More problems?

Yet the rapid build-up of renewables has also created new problems. How will the energy be transported to where it’s needed, namely from the windy north to the industrial, power-hungry south?

“The expansion of electricity networks has not kept up by a long way,” says Jürgen Stotz, president of the German chapter of the World Energy Council NGO.

Part of the lag has to do with citizens filing suit against plans for high-voltage power lines that would criss-cross their neighborhoods or run through protected natural reserves. Stotz says that, at least initially, such complaints were not taken seriously enough.

“One thought that if the goal was ambitious enough, then everything else would come automatically,” he told DW.

New tasks

At the current state of technology, there is also no solution for storing energy when high quantities of wind or sunlight are available. Until such storage facilities are developed, other power plants have to step in when wind or sun is not available. Modern natural gas power plants could fill that role.

At the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), environmental economist Claudia Kemfert complains, though, that coal power plants are being built instead of gas plants. In her view, coal plants cannot complement renewables, since they cannot be started and shut down quickly enough. Lignite, or brown coal, notorious as a source of pollution, will still have to be mined.

“If you’re taking the energy turnaround seriously, you have to also says goodbye to the kind of coal that doesn’t fit with a sustainable energy turnaround,” she told DW.

The pioneer falls behind

Energy experts are also angry at the lack of discussion during the current election cycle about successes in the energy turnaround and necessary improvements. Instead, they speak of the burdens the new policy is causing.

“People only ever talk about energy prices,” Kemfert said, “but those aren’t any kind of indicator for progress in the energy turnaround.”

As a result of the current debate about energy prices, other countries no longer turn to Germany as a positive example in energy policy, looking instead to countries like Sweden. For years, Germany had been considered a leader when it came to climate protection. More than 30 years ago, house owners were installing solar panels on their roofs.

Germany remains a pioneer in questions of climate technology, says Stotz at DIW, but he finds, when he meets specialists from around the world, that “many countries doubt the attainability of our ambitious goal.”

Many, he says, are put off by the accompanying high cost. A survey conducted by the NGO with its worldwide partners confirmed just that.

But, he adds, “The opinion still prevails: If anyone can do it, then it’s the Germans.”

Source:  Date 18.09.2013 | Author Jeanette Seiffert / cd | Editor Michael Lawton | Deutsche Welle | www.dw.de

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.