LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plug pulled on wind farm 

Credit:  By Ethan Stewart | Santa Barbara Independent | July 11, 2013 | independent.com ~~

After nearly a decade of planning and approvals and one pesky lawsuit, the much-ballyhooed Lompoc wind farm is dead. In a statement sent out late last week by Acciona Energy, the parent company behind the alternative-energy project, spokesperson Peter Gray announced that Acciona will not be moving forward with the wind farm despite having all of the proper permits in place. “While the area has great potential for clean energy generation, the best decision for our business is to focus on the development of other U.S. and global projects in the company’s pipeline,” said Gray.

First floated in 2006, the project aimed to put more than 60 turbines on some 2,900 acres of private property leased from a half-dozen different landowners just south of Lompoc near San Miguelito Road. Had it been realized, the farm would have been the first of its kind in Santa Barbara County and could have generated enough juice to power 30,000 homes annually. Lamenting the news, 3rd District County Supervisor Doreen Farr offered, “I still think it is a great project and a perfect location. … I’m hopeful that some other enterprising company will come along, pick it up, and move it forward in the future.”

Pressed for further insight into why his company decided to dash its wind-farm dreams, especially after receiving critical permit extensions from the county earlier this year, Gray explained that it came down to “internal priorities” for the Spain-based company. Gray scoffed at the suggestion that the repeated ​— ​and consistently denied ​— ​appeals of the project by the Bedford family, who live close to a handful of the proposed turbine sites, or the federal government’s soon-to-expire Production Tax Credit for alternative-energy projects had anything to do with Acciona’s decision. Pointing to two large projects currently in the pipes in Chile and Poland, Gray offered simply, “[Lompoc] just wasn’t the highest priority for us. Unfortunately, you just can’t do everything.”

Source:  By Ethan Stewart | Santa Barbara Independent | July 11, 2013 | independent.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky