LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Controversial windfarm plans rejected 

Credit:  Jun 13 2013 by Stuart Gillespie, Galloway News | www.dgstandard.co.uk ~~

Windfarm proposals which attracted more than 500 objections have been kicked out for the second time.

Community Windpower’s appeal to the Scottish Government over its controversial Mayfield development near Kirkcudbright has been rejected.

It follows councillors knocking back plans for the six, 130 metre tall turbines in December because of the impact it would have on the landscape.

Community Windpower appealed because they felt the development would not have a “significant effect on landscape and character” of the Solway Coast regional scenic area or on local landscape.

But Scottish Government reporter Iain Urquhart disagreed.

In rejecting the appeal he said he felt there would be “significant adverse effects” on the landscape and that the turbines “would be dominant visual features at odds with the area’s small scale land use pattern and gentle rounded topography”.

He was also concerned that the attractiveness of the hills would be damaged by the turbines and that they would create a significant visual impact on nearby houses.

The decision to reject the appeal was welcomed by Keith Mycock of local pressure group Turbine Watch 312.

He said: “It was a long three year battle which resulted in the correct result. We are pleased that the recorder recognised the importance of upholding the Dumfries and Galloway planning policy and hope other developers take note and don’t try to proceed with unsuitable applications.”

Community Windpower were unavailable for comment.

Source:  Jun 13 2013 by Stuart Gillespie, Galloway News | www.dgstandard.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky