[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

State clean energy study changes look at hydropower and biomass  

Credit:  By BRIAN DOWLING | The Hartford Courant | April 26, 2013 | www.courant.com ~~

The state’s energy department released a final version of its study recommending changes to how Connecticut supports clean energy Friday after weeks of public debate on the plan that initially blazed a wide path for large-scale hydropower to be included in the state’s portfolio of renewables.

In the final version of the study – and pending legislation that mirrors it – big hydropower, like Hydro-Quebec, is relegated to being a contingency source of power rather than a primary one.

The state could count the large, cost-competitive source of energy toward its clean energy goals if developers of renewable energy fail to build enough wind, solar and other projects to keep up with Connecticut’s goals.

“This study proposes a strategic and thoughtful approach that allows us to reap many benefits from increasing the availability of renewable power,” energy commissioner Daniel C. Esty said in a written statement.

Many expressed deep concerns about how state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection seemed to rush passage of a bill that was based on the draft study, trying to pass it before a month-long comment period finished. In response, legislators slowed the process, and the department’s commissioner said the legislation would not be voted on before the study is completed.

The energy department received more than 75 comments on the study, which “led to some key changes from the draft to the final version,” Esty said.

“These refinements help guarantee the integrity of our commitment to clean energy under the RPS and would set us on a path toward meeting Connecticut’s clean energy goals in the most effective and cost efficient manner,” he said.

The initial concerns about process were echoed, though, on Friday as the final study practically mirrored points outlined in an amended clean energy bill that legislators released earlier this week. Dan Dolan, president of the New England Power Generators Association, said the timeline makes him wonder exactly how the energy department processed public input on the study.

“It leads me to question what type of study and review was given to this,” he said.

Dolan said the approach to large hydropower – his association’s main problem with the study and legislation – hadn’t changed enough. “It doesn’t solve the issue we had with [the bill]. It just dressed it up a little bit.”

The final study and pending bill also change tack on landfill gas and biomass as a source of clean energy. Instead of ratcheting down emissions standards, the plan calls for a phase out in subsidies for those energy sources

The last major change to the study relates to the initial study’s extension of goals – from 20 percent of the state’s energy from certain clean sources by 2020 – to 25 percent by 2025. The final study removes this recommendation.

Other key recommendations in the study: include anaerobic digesters, biologically-derived methane and small hydropower projects to Class I renewables; allow state enter into long-term clean energy contracts; end subsidies to utility-run conservation projects that are already ratepayer funded; and refund payments to ratepayers that energy companies pay when they fall short on energy goals.

Source:  By BRIAN DOWLING | The Hartford Courant | April 26, 2013 | www.courant.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.