LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Tempers flair up at March 5 ACW council meeting 

Despite the public's distaste for the outcome, council was left with few options, citing the fact that they had taken negotiations between their lawyer and K2 as far as they could go. Provincial legislation also factored in. The Green Energy Act states that if municipalities do not create their own legislation (road user and community benefits) to make way for green energy, the province will simply step in and do it for them.

Credit:  Peter May - Special to the Sentinel Tuesday, March 12, 2013 | www.lucknowsentinel.com ~~

The Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh Township council chambers was standing room only for the March 5 Council meeting, as residents packed the building to voice concerns about the road user and community benefit agreements between the township and K2 Wind Power Project.

Discussion and negotiation has been ongoing and council felt that they had reached suitable agreements that help and protect the community.

Residents did not seem to agree with council, however, and were vocal in voicing opposition, which lead to some heated confrontation in the chambers, pitting resident versus resident, and resident versus council member.

Both agreements were voted on and passed by the three voting council members.

Three others council members have conflicts and don’t vote or discuss anything to do with the proposed K2 wind farm in the township.

Despite the public’s distaste for the outcome, council was left with few options, citing the fact that they had taken negotiations between their lawyer and K2 as far as they could go. Provincial legislation also factored in. The Green Energy Act states that if municipalities do not create their own legislation (road user and community benefits) to make way for green energy, the province will simply step in and do it for them.

Municipal Infrastructure

Councillors received a report from B.M. Ross about the state of several bridges in the township, which are in need of repair, or alternatives. Bridges on Cransford, Lanesville, and Division Line are all in less than ideal condition and already have measures such as load limits in place. All of those crossings lack proper width for a roadway, as farm machinery and equipment is currently unable to cross

B.M. Ross representatives Ken Logtenberg and Kelly Bader were on hand to explain the situation council is facing, as well as provide solutions for the future.

Replacing every bridge would be incredibly costly, so basic solutions with best guess costs were drawn up for council to look over. Putting a substantial amount of money into a single bridge was one such solution, which would leave councilors to decide which bridge would be benefit surrounding residents the most. The most prominent solution suggested was to simply build a brand new and full road. While this solution provided the most benefits, Bader was quick to point out that there were substantial setbacks that could arise, namely from surrounding land owners who opposed the suggested location, as well as from environmental assessments which would have to take place. With budget meetings approaching fast, council deferred the discussion on a solution to a later date in order to first assess the year ahead.

Source:  Peter May - Special to the Sentinel Tuesday, March 12, 2013 | www.lucknowsentinel.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky