[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Environmental Tribunal discusses acceptable kill rates of endangered bats 

Credit:  By Cheryl Anderson | March 10, 2013 | countylive.ca ~~

Dr. Robert Barclay presented evidence about bats via a video conference from Calgary on Thursday, in the continuation of the Ostrander Point Environmental Tribunal appeal of the Ministry of Environment’s approval of Gilead Power’s turbine project on the south shore of Prince Edward County.

Myrna Wood, of the Prince Edward County Field Naturalists, (PECFN) listened in on the teleconference. Her report follows:
“Dr. Barclay started his testimony with a clear and simple statement. Sarah Kromkamp, lawyer for the MOE, asked him questions about his various studies which did not seem to lead anywhere at all. Gilead’s lawyer (It was hard on the telephone to be sure whether it was Mr. Hamilton or Mr. Grey) tried to muddy the waters by raising questions about which bat species actually migrated. This was in response to Dr. Barclay quoting Stantec’s figures on “unidentified” species. Grey attempted to make him agree that many of those were really Brown Bats. The lawyer pointed out that the map Barclay had seen did not include the placement of the turbines. Barclay replied that if they are on the shoreline it would be the most dangerous for the bats. His studies show the bats follow the shoreline to avoid flying over the lake. Three of Gilead’s turbines are proposed along the shoreline.

“Grey attempted to introduce a new document by email to Dr. Barclay in Calgary. The document did not arrive and Mr. Gillespie, PECFN’s lawyer, stepped in to argue against introducing evidence in this fashion. Mr. Gillespie then asked Dr. Barclay several simple, direct questions giving him the opportunity to clear up whether the types of species would have changed his conclusions.

“Tribunal co-chair Heather Gibbs asked perceptive questions: First she quoted Stantec’s report that there are no bat species at risk. Dr. Barclay answered that was true when the report was written, but since then the emergence of white nose syndrome had caused the decline of two bat species resulting in an emergency posting as ‘Endangered’, by the Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO). One of the bats listed, the Little Brown Bat, is one of the most common bats. To have it designated as Endangered is astonishing.

“Second question: Dr Barclay had mentioned to the MOE lawyer he did not agree with Ontario Bat Guidelines for Industrial Wind Turbine projects (which they cut off immediately) so Ms. Gibbs asked him why? He answered that the allowable threshold of killing seven bats per year per turbine was inadequate. With the numbers of turbines growing exponentially in North America, the cumulative effects of such a high fatality rate, on top of the effects of white nose syndrome, will cause harm to the species at the population level. He also mentioned that with all the projects planned for the eastern end of Lake Ontario and the South Shore of Prince Edward County that the cumulative kill rate would be unacceptable. He used the analogy of hunting regulations where a hunter is allowed a set number of ducks, but the number of hunters is also controlled.

“Tribunal co-chair Robert Wright followed up on the cumulative effects and asked about acceptable kill rates in other jurisdictions. Dr. Barclay said that the BC threshold is seven bats per turbine per year. In Hawaii it is one and in West Virginia it is three bats per turbine per year. In many US states, the threshold numbers are vague, or there are no numbers.”

The hearing continues on March 18 and then on March 25-2.

Impacts of White-Nose Syndrome on North America’s Bats, by Lesley Hale, Science and Information Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough http://nfwcc.com/presentations/presentations/37_Lesley_Hale.pdf

Ministry of Natural Resources report on Bat Hibernation and Hibernacula: http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@fw/documents/document/269068.pdf

Source:  By Cheryl Anderson | March 10, 2013 | countylive.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon