[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Spin on wind report disturbing 

Credit:  New Richmond News | January 12, 2013 | www.newrichmond-news.com ~~

I find it odd that Clean Wisconsin could misinterpret the parameters of the “A Cooperative Measurement Survey and Analysis of Low Frequency and Infrasound at the Shirley Wind Farm.”

In a press release, the pro-wind organization appears to contradict the conclusions of its own hired experts. Tyson Cook, Clean Wisconsin staff scientist stated, “After testing three homes near Shirley Wind Farm, scientists were unable to measure any low-frequency sound…above the threshold of human hearing…”

The testing was not about audible noise, nor was it intended to find a direct, medical link. The testing did document both low frequency noise and infrasound in the Shirley homes. (Read full report at: http://www.psc.wi.gov/apps35/ERF_view/viewdoc.aspx?docid=178263)

The purpose of the Shirley survey was to investigate if industrial scale wind turbines emit low frequency noise (LFN) and infrasound, and if so, at what levels. As I understand it, LFN is often below the threshold of hearing and infrasound is entirely. Exposure is known to cause negative health effects including sleep deprivation, nausea, headache, dizziness, ear pain, and anxiety.

Cook also stated, “There are no peer-reviewed studies showing negative health impacts from wind turbine sounds below the threshold of hearing.” A collection of some studies can be found at: https://www.wind-watch.org/documents/wind-turbine-noise-and-health-special-issue-of-bulletin-of-science-technology-society/.

I agree with Cook that, “It’s important that we fully understand the impacts of our energy sources…” especially the health consequences of industrial scale wind turbine LFN and infrasound. Cook states the study finds no physical link between wind farm sound and negative health impacts. Yet the acoustical firms involved in the sound testing were unanimous, “The four investigating firms are of the opinion that enough evidence and hypotheses have been given herein to classify LFN and infrasound as a serious issue, possibly affecting the future of the industry” and “We recommend additional study on an urgent priority basis…” Scientific study is clearly needed to establish humane and appropriate turbine location setbacks from homes to protect the health and safety of exposed populations.

Apparently, Clean Wisconsin has no empathy for the Shirley families who have unwillingly left their homes to recover their health and no conscience about the likely consequences Highland Wind could have on the residents in and around the Town of Forest.

According to the report the experts also concluded, “In this specific case, it seems justified to the two firms to be conservative (one more than the other) to avoid a duplicate project to Shirley at Highland(s) because there is no technical reason to believe the community response would be different.”

Clean Wisconsin’s press release seems to me a classic piece of spin. The wind industry has long claimed industrial turbines either do not produce LFN and infrasound or not at significant levels. In almost every community worldwide where large-scale wind turbines have been inappropriately sited, population health problems have followed.

Could it be that the transparent attempts to discredit world-class sound experts will result in the wind industry blowing down its own house of cards?

Brenda Salseg

Town of Forest

Source:  New Richmond News | January 12, 2013 | www.newrichmond-news.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon