LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Sedgefield MP presents Bill to make it easier for local people to reject giant windfarms 

Credit:  By Robert Merrick, Parliamentary Correspondent | 12 December 2012 | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk ~~

A bill to make it easier for local people to block the building of giant wind turbines will be presented to parliament today (Wednesday, December 12), by a North-East MP.

Phil Wilson, the Sedgefield MP, will urge ministers to change the rules to prevent the decision being automatically “called in ” and made by a government minister.

The move follows growing concern over the spread of wind farms in County Durham, which has led to fears that the area will become the “land of the wind turbine”.

Already, there are 17 wind farms in operation, with a further 13 in the planning system – enough to power 70 per cent of the homes in the county, Mr Wilson said.

And battle is raging over E.ON’s plans for a 24-turbine wind development near Newton Aycliffe, called The Isles, which is currently out to consultation.

Turbines could be built within a mile of Newton Aycliffe and Chilton, and close to Woodham, Bradbury, Mordon and Preston-le-Skerne, either side of the A1(M) and close to the A167.

Now Mr Wilson will argue The Isles is exactly the sort of proposal that should be decided by local planners, not the Local Government Secretary, acting on the advice of the planning inspectorate quango.

He said: “At the moment, if a wind farm is going to generate more than 50 megawatts of electricity it is deemed to be a project of ‘national significance’ and the decision is made by the secretary of state.

“Yet the E.ON application will only generate enough electricity for Newton Aycliffe and Sedgefield Village. Much as I love those two places, the issue of a wind farm for them is not of national significance.

“A nuclear power station – such as the one, 15 miles away, that generates 1,480 megawatts – is of national significance, but wind farms should be decided by the local planning authority.”

Mr Wilson added that County Durham already generated 27 per cent of its power from renewable sources – within touching distance of the national target of 30 per cent, by 2020.

The E.ON application is due to be decided by Energy Secretary Ed Davey, taking advice from what a minister called an “expert unit” within the department.

The Liberal Democrat is pro-wind power, but Conservatives from David Cameron downwards have made increasingly hostile noises about onshore developments.

Meanwhile, it was revealed yesterday that a 69-year-old grandmother is mounting a landmark legal challenge against the government over the number of wind turbines being built in Scotland.

Christine Metcalfe, from Argyll, will claim today, at the United Nations in Geneva, that Britain and the European Union have failed to ensure the public is given accurate information about the adverse impact of wind power.

Source:  By Robert Merrick, Parliamentary Correspondent | 12 December 2012 | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky