LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Miller wants debate on Maryland wind bill 

Credit:  By Brian Witte | Associated Press | December 11, 2012 | www.washingtontimes.com ~~

ANNAPOLIS | Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller said Tuesday he will consider changes to the Senate Finance Committee, if that is necessary to advance an offshore wind measure to the full Senate for debate in the upcoming legislative session.

“People have to understand that this is a shared burden for improving planet Earth, and moving our state where a number of other states and European countries are going for the benefit of not just our state but the entire planet,” Mr. Miller said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Mr. Miller, Calvert Democrat, said he would be reluctant to take the step of changing the committee’s membership, but he said he is willing to make the unusual move to have a debate on a measure that has failed to reach the Senate floor the last two years. The Senate president also noted he would not be as inclined to make changes to the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee to advance a repeal of capital punishment, which is locked up in a close vote in that committee.

The difference, Mr. Miller said, is the offshore wind measure has not been debated on the Senate floor.

“I might have to do that in terms of getting out a wind power bill to the floor, because it’s been two years now and two years of testimony and two years of hearings, and environmentalists feel that this is an issue that needs to be debated on the floor, as contrasted to the death penalty, where just three years ago we got it to the floor and had extensive debates and it was modified,” Mr. Miller said.

Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, has pushed unsuccessfully for the offshore wind measure in the last two legislative sessions, and he is expected to try again.

A scaled-back version of the bill passed the House of Delegates last year on an 88-47 vote. The bill would have helped develop offshore wind off the coast of Ocean City in as soon as five years.

Mr. Miller said he supports offshore wind, with qualifications. The Senate president also said there are a number of factors that need to be considered, such as how much it would cost, where workers would come from, and what parts of the state would benefit. Under last year’s offshore wind proposal, residential utility customers would have paid about $1.50 a month.

“We’re going to debate this this year,” Mr. Miller said, referring to the wind proposal. “The death penalty, I’m not certain. I think, probably, if it’s not this year, probably next year.”

In 2009, when Mr. O’Malley led a push to repeal capital punishment, the Senate passed a compromise measure that restricted the death penalty to murder cases with biological evidence such as DNA, videotaped evidence of a murder or a videotaped confession. Maryland has not had an execution since Mr. O’Malley became governor in 2007, and Mr. Miller noted that capital punishment is rarely used in the state. Maryland has five men on death row.

Mr. Miller said he still believes in keeping the death penalty on the books to apply in extreme cases such as mass murderers. As an example, he mentioned sniper mastermind John Allen Muhammad, who terrorized the Washington area 10 years ago. Muhammad was executed in Virginia in 2009.

“I just think for mass murderers I think there needs to be a special category for people like that,” Mr. Miller said. “We don’t need to continue to subsidize them, prolong their life.”

Source:  By Brian Witte | Associated Press | December 11, 2012 | www.washingtontimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky