[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Putting the Hoosac Wind Project in perspective 

Credit:  North Adams Transcript | 12/05/2012 | www.thetranscript.com ~~

At the ribbon-cutting ceremony for the Hoosac Wind Project on Dec. 3, Gov. Deval Patrick and others frequently claimed that this project will provide power for 10,000 homes. These projects are always promoted this way.

In truth, residential electricity only accounts for about a third of total electricity consumption. Massachusetts has 2.5 million households. To put this in perspective, this largest wind farm in Massachusetts will produce, on an annual basis, only enough power for one out of every 250 households in the state … or one 750th of electrical power consumed in Massachusetts.

Electric power consumption, total, only accounts for about a third of anthropocentric green house gas emissions. The best you could say is that Hoosac Wind will offset 1 ton of Massachusetts green house gases for every 2,250 tons that are produced.

However, this large figure needs to be tempered by the fact that a considerable amount of green house gases were emitted in the process of eliminating 75 acres of forest, as well as in manufacturing, transporting and installing massive amounts of concrete and steel. And, of course, the figure assumes that wind energy can be incorporated into the grid without affecting the efficiency of fossil fuel generators needed to offset the erratic nature of wind energy.

Disturbingly, demand for new electricity is growing faster than in-state wind/solar generating capacity. So, contrary to what the governor said to the media, we are actually losing ground.

These facts eclipse all other facets of the debate about wind power in that they challenge the very core of widely held assumptions about what we can really accomplish with wind energy. When so little is gained, why is it worth the massive public subsidies and impact on neighbors, wildlife, etc.?

Lloyd Crawford


Dec. 4

Source:  North Adams Transcript | 12/05/2012 | www.thetranscript.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky