LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Hull’s offshore wind farm project in jeopardy 

Credit:  By Neal Simpson | The Patriot Ledger | www.patriotledger.com ~~

HULL – A study is casting serious doubt about a proposal to build a series of wind turbines 11/2 miles off the coast of Nantasket Beach.

Officials have been studying the feasibility of constructing four or five offshore wind turbines, enough to power the entire town under ideal wind conditions. But the project has been on hold for several years, and a recent report suggests it may be too expensive and generate too little revenue to make it worthwhile.

“We’re discovering now that it’s a tremendously expensive project,” said Patrick Cannon, chairman of the Hull Municipal Light Plant’s board of commissioners. “My gut feeling is no, we’re not going to be able to do it.”

The report, which was presented to the town in October, pegged the cost of a 3- to 5-megawatt project at around $105 million. It said the project has become more challenging as the cost of offshore turbine construction climbs and energy market revenues falls.

“It’s become clearer that there’s a very daunting set of challenges,” Town Manager Philip Lemnios said.

Hull officials have discussed the possibility of an offshore wind farm since at least 2003. The Hull Municipal Light Plant received a $1.7 million grant from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative to study the feasibility of the project in 2006 and secured a $951,000 congressional earmark in 2009.

Ian Bowles, secretary of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, gave the project initial state approval in 2008, but Cannon, the light board chairman, said the town eventually put the project on hold because it needed more information before proceeding.

“We were at a point where we needed a really reliable report on what the actual costs would be, and to sharpen up all those figures,” he said. “So we put it on the back burner until we could get that information.”

The light board is expected to consider the recent report’s findings and make a decision on the future of the project at a public meeting in January.

See a rendering and video simulation of the project on Hull’s town website.

Source:  By Neal Simpson | The Patriot Ledger | www.patriotledger.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky