| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way.
Benefits of wind power are unproven
Credit: By John Droz Jr. | News & Record | October 21, 2012 | www.news-record.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
As a physicist and North Carolina resident, I was most surprised by your recent editorial on wind energy.
It was distressing that editors of a credible newspaper like the News & Record would make so many misinformed statements on such an important issue.
For instance: “Can military concerns blow away wind energy development in eastern North Carolina, an area that holds some of the most promising wind energy potential in the Eastern United States?” Wind maps clearly show that eastern North Carolina has very marginal wind resources.
For instance: “North Carolina takes pride in being a military-friendly state, but it should not sacrifice its own interests.” Exactly how is wind development in this state in the interest of North Carolina taxpayers or ratepayers? There is zero scientific proof that wind energy has any net technical, economic or environmental benefits. So exactly how is promoting an energy source with no proven net benefits in North Carolina’s interest?
For instance: “There’s a strong case for wind energy development. North Carolina requires power companies to produce a portion of their electricity with renewable energy.” What’s the connection between those two sentences? Where is the scientific proof of this “strong case”? The only reason we have an RPS (renewable portfolio standard) is that wind industry lobbyists pulled a fast one on our legislators. Just because we have been tricked doesn’t mean that it is a good idea to continue to play along with the charade.
For instance: “Gov. Perdue’s office and members of the state’s congressional delegation should prod the Pentagon to find ways that wind energy can co-exist with … military activities.” Exactly why should a high-cost, low-benefit be shoe-horned in to co-exist with our military?
For instance: “… All of eastern North Carolina can’t be ruled off limits. … It would kill a promising industry before it gets off the ground.” You have phrased that correctly, as the wind industry is entirely made up of promises.
Please reconsider your position on energy matters and support alternatives that have proven net benefits. For more information, see Energypresentation.info.
The writer lives in Morehead City.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=29287 ]
