[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Benefits of wind power are unproven  

Credit:  By John Droz Jr. | News & Record | October 21, 2012 | www.news-record.com ~~

As a physicist and North Carolina resident, I was most surprised by your recent editorial on wind energy.

It was distressing that editors of a credible newspaper like the News & Record would make so many misinformed statements on such an important issue.

For instance: “Can military concerns blow away wind energy development in eastern North Carolina, an area that holds some of the most promising wind energy potential in the Eastern United States?” Wind maps clearly show that eastern North Carolina has very marginal wind resources.

For instance: “North Carolina takes pride in being a military-friendly state, but it should not sacrifice its own interests.” Exactly how is wind development in this state in the interest of North Carolina taxpayers or ratepayers? There is zero scientific proof that wind energy has any net technical, economic or environmental benefits. So exactly how is promoting an energy source with no proven net benefits in North Carolina’s interest?

For instance: “There’s a strong case for wind energy development. North Carolina requires power companies to produce a portion of their electricity with renewable energy.” What’s the connection between those two sentences? Where is the scientific proof of this “strong case”? The only reason we have an RPS (renewable portfolio standard) is that wind industry lobbyists pulled a fast one on our legislators. Just because we have been tricked doesn’t mean that it is a good idea to continue to play along with the charade.

For instance: “Gov. Perdue’s office and members of the state’s congressional delegation should prod the Pentagon to find ways that wind energy can co-exist with … military activities.” Exactly why should a high-cost, low-benefit be shoe-horned in to co-exist with our military?

For instance: “… All of eastern North Carolina can’t be ruled off limits. … It would kill a promising industry before it gets off the ground.” You have phrased that correctly, as the wind industry is entirely made up of promises.

Please reconsider your position on energy matters and support alternatives that have proven net benefits. For more information, see Energypresentation.info.

The writer lives in Morehead City.

Source:  By John Droz Jr. | News & Record | October 21, 2012 | www.news-record.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.