[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

State defends Newark in wind energy case  

Credit:  Written by Candace Page, Free Press Staff Writer | Burlington Free Press | Oct 18, 2012 | www.burlingtonfreepress.com ~~

New, clearly written opposition to commercial wind development in the Newark town plan must be considered as the Public Service Board weighs an application for a project known as Seneca Mountain Wind, the Public Service Department argued in a memorandum filed this week.

At issue are plans by Eolian Renewable Energy of Portsmouth, N.H., to erect wind-measuring towers in Newark, Brighton and Ferdinand as one step toward a potential 35-tower wind project.

Newark residents voted 169-59 last month to amend their town plan to oppose “industrial scale generation and transmission facilities” in the community.

The amendments also barred commercial structures taller than 125 feet, which would rule out Eolian’s wind-measuring tower.

A preliminary question facing the Public Service Board, which must approve energy projects, is whether Newark’s town plan amendments came too late to be considered in the case.

The separate Public Service Department, which represents the public in front of the board, argued this week that the town plan is timely and should be considered.

The department’s lawyer argued that Eolian’s application was still incomplete when Newark voted. In addition, the town plan amendments simply add clarity to the existing town plan which called for “caution” in considering power generation facilities, the memo argued.

Eolian disagrees with that interpretation. In its filing with the board, the company argues that its application for the wind-measuring tower was properly filed in April, well before Newark amended its town plan. Therefore, the unamended town plan is the one that should be examined by the PSB, the company argued.

That situation shouldn’t change, despite an August finding by the board’s hearing officer that the application was incomplete because Eolian had not notified some adjoining property owners, the company further argued.

The Public Service Department’s stance in the Newark case has been of public interest because the administration of Gov. Peter Shumlin strongly supports renewable energy development. The governor, however, has recently emphasized that wind projects should not be imposed on towns that do not want them.

The department’s memo in the Newark case stops short of urging the Public Service Board to reject Eolian’s application.

Public Service Department Commissioner Elizabeth Miller said Thursday morning it would be premature to take a position.

“The board asked a narrow legal question, whether the town plan should be considered,” she said. “The department will have a chance to make a final recommendation in the future.”

Earlier this month Miller’s department urged rejection of an application for a wind-measuring tower in the town of Windham, on grounds the town plan includes a “clear mandate” against wind development.

Source:  Written by Candace Page, Free Press Staff Writer | Burlington Free Press | Oct 18, 2012 | www.burlingtonfreepress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter