[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Mortlake farmer’s wind worries 

Credit:  LOUISE PREECE | Stock & Land | 19 October 2012 | sl.farmonline.com.au ~~

Mortlake Hereford breeder Peter Allen and his wife Lisa concerned over the possible effects of a proposed wind farm in their local region, where Acciona Energy plans to erect 51 turbines.

Recently, he and four other neighbours paid $3000 each to put an independent noise monitor on their properties over a period of a fortnight, hoping to compare the research to Acciona’s own data loggers.

It was in the pre-construction phase, where background noise was examined.

“But after two weeks Acciona rang me to say their equipment had not been working, which made our data null and void,” he said.

“That’s money down the drain.”

Mr Allen said if the company was “fair dinkum” it would offer to pay for another independent test.

“I don’t believe the fox should be in charge of the chickens,” he said.

He said independent research such as this was vital and should not be left up to the wind companies to carry out.

In response, Acciona’s Brett Wickham reported the company’s meteorological mast had actually broken down in that specified period, but they had informed the landowners straight away.

“We have offered to pay for another independent noise monitor and are more than happy to do that,” he said.

“I wasn’t happy the met mast had broken, but it does happen from time to time.”

He added Acciona adhered to strict compliance rules regarding noise monitoring, and that they employed the services of independent companies to conduct the tests.

“These companies need to uphold their reputations too,” he said.

Source:  LOUISE PREECE | Stock & Land | 19 October 2012 | sl.farmonline.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky